Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A prospective evaluation of breast thermography enhanced by a novel machine learning technique for screening breast abnormalities in a general population of women presenting to a secondary care hospital

Richa Bansal, Sathiakar Collison, Bharat Aggarwal
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.27.22282737
Richa Bansal
1Radiology Services, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sathiakar Collison
2Department of Clinical Affairs, Niramai Health Analytix Pvt Ltd, Bangalore, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: spcollison@gmail.com
Bharat Aggarwal
1Radiology Services, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objective Artificial intelligence-enhanced breast thermography is being evaluated as an ancillary modality in the evaluation of breast disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of Thermalytix, a CE-marked, AI-based thermal imaging test, with respect to conventional mammography.

Methods A prospective, comparative study performed between 15 December 2018 and 06 January 2020 evaluated the performance of Thermalytix in 459 women with both dense and nondense breast tissue. Both symptomatic and asymptomatic women, aged 30 to 80 years, presenting to the hospital underwent Thermalytix followed by 2-D mammography and appropriate confirmatory investigations to confirm malignancy. The radiologist interpreting the mammograms and the technician using the Thermalytix tool were blinded to the others’ findings. The statistical analysis was performed by a third party.

Results A total of 687 women were recruited, of whom 459 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one malignancies were detected (21/459, 4.6%). The overall sensitivity of Thermalytix was 95.24% (95% CI, 76.18-99.88), and the specificity was 88.58% (95% CI, 85.23-91.41). In women with dense breasts (n=168, 36.6%), the sensitivity was 100% (95% CI, 69.15-100), and the specificity was 81.65% (95% CI, 74.72-87.35). Among these 168 women, 37 women (22%) were reported as BI-RADS 0 on mammography; in this subset, the sensitivity of Thermalytix was 100% (95% CI, 69.15-100), and the specificity was 77.22% (95% CI, 69.88-83.50).

Conclusion Thermalytix showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity with respect to mammography in the overall patient population. Thermalytix outperformed mammography in women with dense breasts and those reported as BI-RADS 0.

Key points

  1. Compared with mammography as the reference, Thermalytix showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity of 95.24% and 88.58%, respectively, in the overall patient population (N=459).

  2. Among women with dense breasts (n=168), 37 women (22%) were reported as BI-RADS 0 (incomplete examination) on mammograms, whereas Thermalytix identified all malignancies.

  3. Thermalytix identified all malignancies among premenopausal women and women younger than 50 years of age.

Summary Statement Thermalytix, an AI-based thermal imaging tool, showed acceptable sensitivity and specificity when mammography was used as the reference in the overall patient population and in women with dense breast tissue.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by Niramai Health Analytix developer of the Thermalytix system

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

For this prospective cross-sectional study number approval was obtained from Institutional Ethics Committee of Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, New Delhi

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

  • Abbreviations

    AI
    Artificial Intelligence
    ACR
    American College of Radiology
    AUC
    Area under the curve
    BI-RADS
    Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System
    CBE
    Clinical breast examination
    LMICs
    Low-and middle-income countries
    PPV
    Positive-predictive value
    NPV
    Negative-predictive value
    ROC
    Receiver operating characteristic
    RF
    Random Forest
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted November 30, 2022.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    A prospective evaluation of breast thermography enhanced by a novel machine learning technique for screening breast abnormalities in a general population of women presenting to a secondary care hospital
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    A prospective evaluation of breast thermography enhanced by a novel machine learning technique for screening breast abnormalities in a general population of women presenting to a secondary care hospital
    Richa Bansal, Sathiakar Collison, Bharat Aggarwal
    medRxiv 2022.11.27.22282737; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.27.22282737
    Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    A prospective evaluation of breast thermography enhanced by a novel machine learning technique for screening breast abnormalities in a general population of women presenting to a secondary care hospital
    Richa Bansal, Sathiakar Collison, Bharat Aggarwal
    medRxiv 2022.11.27.22282737; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.27.22282737

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Radiology and Imaging
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (230)
    • Allergy and Immunology (507)
    • Anesthesia (111)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (1262)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (207)
    • Dermatology (148)
    • Emergency Medicine (283)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (538)
    • Epidemiology (10055)
    • Forensic Medicine (5)
    • Gastroenterology (502)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2486)
    • Geriatric Medicine (240)
    • Health Economics (482)
    • Health Informatics (1653)
    • Health Policy (757)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
    • Hematology (250)
    • HIV/AIDS (538)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11896)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (627)
    • Medical Education (255)
    • Medical Ethics (75)
    • Nephrology (269)
    • Neurology (2304)
    • Nursing (140)
    • Nutrition (354)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
    • Oncology (1259)
    • Ophthalmology (377)
    • Orthopedics (134)
    • Otolaryngology (226)
    • Pain Medicine (158)
    • Palliative Medicine (50)
    • Pathology (326)
    • Pediatrics (737)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
    • Primary Care Research (282)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2295)
    • Public and Global Health (4850)
    • Radiology and Imaging (846)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
    • Respiratory Medicine (657)
    • Rheumatology (289)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
    • Sports Medicine (228)
    • Surgery (273)
    • Toxicology (44)
    • Transplantation (131)
    • Urology (100)