Abstract
Background Executive function (EF) is an umbrella term used to describe higher-order cognitive processes. Among the test batteries for EF, the Adult Executive Functioning Inventory (ADEXI) is prominent because of several advantages: it is brief, focuses on the core concept of EF, and does not include hard-to-understand general expressions and/or things that are connected but not directly linked to EFs.
Aims To translate the ADEXI into Japanese and reduce the number of items required for optimization. The validation was performed using external self-reporting and laboratory task measurements.
Methods A Japanese version of the ADEXI (J-ADEXI) was created through a regular translation procedure and tested using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We also conducted a Mokken scaling analysis (MSA) to reduce the number of J-ADEXI items and correlational analyses with external surveys and laboratory tasks.
Results Although both the original model with 14 items and new the reduced model with 12 items have adequate reliability and validity, the latter was better in terms of model fit. Through discussion, we determined that J-ADEXI includes all 14 items and allows the user to choose a scoring model (i.e., 12 or 14 items model).
Conclusions The J-ADEXI could briefly assess EF with adequate psychometric properties, and this study may also provide clues towards the optimization of the original and/or other language versions of the ADEXI.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI) (grant numbers: 19K14481 and 19H00631) to TK.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work complied with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human participants were approved by institutional review board of Tokai University (No. 22020).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
We have included external laboratory (i.e., flanker and N-back) tasks for validation, resulting in indicating the adequate validity of both models in J-ADEXI.
Data Availability
The data underlying the results presented in the study are only available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request because of the data collection agencies' privacy policy.
