Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Comparison of Simulated Outcomes Between Stool- and Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests

View ORCID ProfileA. Mark Fendrick, View ORCID ProfileVahab Vahdat, Jing Voon Chen, David Lieberman, View ORCID ProfileJordan J. Karlitz, View ORCID ProfilePaul J. Limburg, View ORCID ProfileA. Burak Ozbay, View ORCID ProfileJohn B. Kisiel
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.27.22281611
A. Mark Fendrick
1Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Health Management and Policy, Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Mark Fendrick
  • For correspondence: amfen{at}med.umich.edu
Vahab Vahdat
2Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vahab Vahdat
Jing Voon Chen
2Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Lieberman
3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jordan J. Karlitz
4Division of Gastroenterology, Denver Health Medical Center and University of Colorado, School of Medicine, Denver, CO
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jordan J. Karlitz
Paul J. Limburg
2Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul J. Limburg
A. Burak Ozbay
2Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI
PhD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. Burak Ozbay
John B. Kisiel
5Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
MD
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for John B. Kisiel
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objectives The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recommends covering blood-based tests meeting proposed minimum performance thresholds for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Outcomes were compared between currently available stool-based screening tests and a hypothetical blood-based test meeting CMS minimum thresholds.

Methods Using the CRC-AIM model, outcomes were simulated for average-risk individuals screened between ages 45-75 years with triennial multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA), annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and annual fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Per CMS guidance, blood-based CRC screening was modeled triennially, with 74% CRC sensitivity and 90% specificity. Although not specified by CMS, adenoma sensitivity was set between 10-20%. Published adenoma and CRC sensitivity and specificity were used for stool-based tests. Adherence was set at (a) 100%, (b) 30-70%, in 10% increments, and (c) real-world rates for stool-based tests (mt-sDNA=65.6%; FIT=42.6%; FOBT=34.4%).

Results Assuming perfect adherence, a blood-based test produced ≥19 lower LYG than stool-based strategies. At the best-case scenario for blood-based tests (100% adherence and 20% adenoma sensitivity), mt-sDNA at real-world adherence achieved more LYG (287.2 vs 297.1, respectively) with 14% fewer colonoscopies. At 100% blood-based test adherence and real-world mt-sDNA and FIT adherence, the blood-based test would require advanced adenoma sensitivity of 30% to reach the LYG of mt-sDNA (297.1) and approximately 15% sensitivity to reach the LYG of FIT (258.9).

Conclusions This model suggests that blood-based tests with CMS minimally-acceptable CRC sensitivity and low advanced adenoma sensitivity will frequently yield inferior outcomes to stool-based testing across a wide range of adherence assumptions.

Competing Interest Statement

A.M. Fendrick has been a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Centivo, Community Oncology Association, Covered California, EmblemHealth, Exact Sciences, Freedman Health, GRAIL, Harvard University, Health & Wellness Innovations, Health at Scale Technologies, MedZed, Penguin Pay, Risalto, Sempre Health, the State of Minnesota, U.S. Department of Defense, Virginia Center for Health Innovation, Wellth, and Zansors; has received research support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Gary and Mary West Health Policy Center, Arnold Ventures, National Pharmaceutical Council, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the State of Michigan, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. V. Vahdat, J.V. Chen, and A.B. Ozbay are employees of Exact Sciences Corporation. D. Lieberman has served on an advisory board for ColoWrap and Freenome. J.J. Karlitz has been a consultant for Exact Sciences Corporation and has an equity position in Gastro Girl. P.J. Limburg serves as Chief Medical Officer for Screening at Exact Sciences. J.B. Kisiel has received research support from Exact Sciences through a contracted services agreement and is an inventor of Mayo Clinic intellectual property, licensed to Exact Sciences, for which he could receive royalties, paid to Mayo Clinic.

Funding Statement

Financial support for this study was provided through a contract with Exact Sciences Corporation. The funding agreement ensured the authors independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. Exact Sciences Corporation contributed to the study design, data analysis, interpretation of the data, and writing of the report.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Financial support: Financial support for this study was provided through a contract with Exact Sciences Corporation. The funding agreement ensured the authors’ independence in designing the study, interpreting the data, writing, and publishing the report. Exact Sciences Corporation contributed to the study design, data analysis, interpretation of the data, and writing of the report.

  • Conflicts of interest: A.M. Fendrick has been a consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Centivo, Community Oncology Association, Covered California, EmblemHealth, Exact Sciences, Freedman Health, GRAIL, Harvard University, Health & Wellness Innovations, Health at Scale Technologies, MedZed, Penguin Pay, Risalto, Sempre Health, the State of Minnesota, U.S. Department of Defense, Virginia Center for Health Innovation, Wellth, and Zansors; has received research support from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Gary and Mary West Health Policy Center, Arnold Ventures, National Pharmaceutical Council, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the State of Michigan, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. V. Vahdat, J.V. Chen, and A.B. Ozbay are employees of Exact Sciences Corporation. D. Lieberman has served on an advisory board for ColoWrap and Freenome. J.J. Karlitz has been a consultant for Exact Sciences Corporation and has an equity position in Gastro Girl. P.J. Limburg serves as Chief Medical Officer for Screening at Exact Sciences. J.B. Kisiel has received research support from Exact Sciences through a contracted services agreement and is an inventor of Mayo Clinic intellectual property, licensed to Exact Sciences, for which he could receive royalties, paid to Mayo Clinic.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted October 30, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes Between Stool- and Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes Between Stool- and Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
A. Mark Fendrick, Vahab Vahdat, Jing Voon Chen, David Lieberman, Jordan J. Karlitz, Paul J. Limburg, A. Burak Ozbay, John B. Kisiel
medRxiv 2022.10.27.22281611; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.27.22281611
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes Between Stool- and Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests
A. Mark Fendrick, Vahab Vahdat, Jing Voon Chen, David Lieberman, Jordan J. Karlitz, Paul J. Limburg, A. Burak Ozbay, John B. Kisiel
medRxiv 2022.10.27.22281611; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.27.22281611

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Economics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13376)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3268)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14628)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1705)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)