Abstract
Objective The study objective was to evaluate the association between maternal Karenia brevis (K. brevis) exposure during pregnancy and the prevalence of biliary atresia (BA) in offspring. Study Design This was a hospital-based, case-control study in which cases were infants diagnosed with BA at Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital from October 2001 to December 2019. Controls were matched 4:1 by age, randomly selected from healthy infants hospitalized during the study period for common pediatric diagnoses. Infants were excluded if they had congenital anomalies and/or were non-Florida residents. Gestational K. brevis exposure levels (cells/liter) were determined from Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission exposure data at 10- and 50-mile radii from the mother’s zip code of residence. Multivariable conditional logistic regression determined adjusted odds of BA in offspring based on maternal gestational K. brevis exposure.
Results Of 38 cases and 152 controls, no significant inter-group differences were observed in race/ethnicity, season of birth or coastal residence. Median gestational exposure at the 10-mile radius was 0 cells/liter in both groups. A greater proportion of cases had no K. brevis exposure (63.2%, n = 24) in comparison to controls (37.5%, n = 57; p = .04) at a 10-mile radius. At the 50-mile radius, cases had a peak median exposure at 6 months of gestation compared to controls’ peak at 9 months. After adjustment for sex, seasonality, race/ethnicity, and coastal residence, there was no significant association between BA and maximum K. brevis exposure per trimester of pregnancy at the 10-or 50-mile radius.
Conclusion We observed no association between gestational K. brevis (cells/liter) exposure at a 10- and 50-mile radius from maternal zip code of residence and BA in offspring.
Key points
Environmental toxins may cause biliary atresia (BA)
Red tide is caused by algal blooms (Karenia brevis)
Red tide is debilitating to marine wildlife
Gestational exposure to K. brevis does not cause BA
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved by Johns Hopkins All Childrens Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB00252758) prior to initiation.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
(jamie{at}jhmi.edu)
(rgwells{at}pennmedicine.upenn.edu)
(jmachry1{at}jhmi.edu)
(skarjoo1{at}jhmi.edu)
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
