Abstract
A valid context-specific measurement of health is critical for evaluating health policies and interventions. The Positive Health dialogue is a tool that is increasingly being used to evaluate health. However, this tool is meant to spark conversations about health rather than measure context-specific health. In this paper, we advance the Positive Health dialogue tool into a measurement instrument, that we denote as the Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ). We build on previous efforts to create the CPHQ, using the Capability Approach as a theoretical framework. The measurement was developed in three stages: 1) focus groups, 2) expert consultations, and 3) validation among a representative panel of Dutch citizens. The goal of both the (1) focus groups and (2) expert consultations phases was to pilot test and refine previously proposed Positive Health questionnaires into an initial version of the CPHQ. The validation phase (3) sought to examine the initial CPHQ’s factorial validity, using Factor Analysis, and its concurrent validity, using Multivariate Regression Analysis. The developed questionnaire demonstrated adequate factorial and concurrent validity. Furthermore, it explicitly accounts for resilience, which is a key component of Positive Health. We introduced four benefits by aligning the CPHQ instrument with the Capability Approach. First, it embedded the measurement in a theoretical framework, which is required for theory development and testing. Second, it focused the questionnaire on a key concept of Positive Health - that is, on the “ability to adapt.” Third, it addressed issues of health equity by taking contextual factors into account. Fourth, it aided in developing more understandable measurement items. The introduced measurement (i.e., the CPHQ) includes 11 dimensions, which we labeled as follows: relaxation, autonomy, fitness, perceived environmental safety, exclusion, social support, financial resources, political representation, health literacy, resilience, and enjoyment.
Highlights
- The Context-sensitive Positive Health Questionnaire (CPHQ) was developed using items from Positive Health questionnaires and the Capability Approach, which were then refined through focus groups and professional advice.
- The questionnaire considers individuals’ unique environment, an aspect often overlooked in health measurements that can affect how someone feels.
- By aligning the CPHQ instrument with the Capability Approach, we embedded the measurement in a theoretical framework, which is required for theory development and testing.
- By embedding the measurement in the Capability Approach and including the Brief Resilience Scale into the initial questionnaire, we accounted for a key concept of Positive Health - that is, the “ability to adapt.”
- The developed scale showed adequate factorial validity and concurrent validity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project was received by the Fred Foundation, Noaber Foundation, and ZonMW.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethical Review Board of the Leiden University Medical Center (protocol 19-035) and the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen (protocol 202007).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.
