Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

A Process-Mining Model to Detect Adverse Postoperative Blood Transfusions

View ORCID ProfileAhmet Murat Sumer, View ORCID ProfileCemil Ceylan
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280177
Ahmet Murat Sumer
3Industrial Enginering, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ahmet Murat Sumer
  • For correspondence: msumer@itu.edu.tr
Cemil Ceylan
4Industrial Engineering, Istanbul Technical University
Roles: Assoc. Professor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Cemil Ceylan
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Importance Errors that threaten patient safety can cause patient harm, death, and rising health care costs. Manual process to expose adverse events (AE) increase time spend to detect them and increase costs of detection.

Objective This study aims to make it easier and faster to expose AEs related with postoperative blood usages by process mining.

Design These errors can be reported voluntarily by healthcare givers or exposed by Global Trigger Tool (GTT) determined by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). With process mining ‘Transfusion of Blood or Use of Blood Products’ (C1) cases were exposed in a data set. Actual life process was discovered and GTT C1 was searched as a process pattern in the discovered process. Instead of reviewing all cases manually, only detected cases were reviewed by patient safety subject matter experts.

Setting and Participants Anadolu Medical Center, Turkey was selected as the reference site for this quality improvement study. The data set includes 42,086 records, 2,870 cases and 20 activities for the period between October and December 2018.

Main Outcomes and Measures With the new process mining model, data was reduced to 2,704 records, 57 cases and 16 activities. 57 cases detected by the model were analyzed by the expert group and 10 of them are defined as AEs. Rate of C1 AEs per medical record is 1.0%. The rate of C1 AEs per medical record was between 1.3% and 8.3% in other research papers.

Conclusions and Relevance Instead of running the classic GTT model manually, only detected 57 patient files were analyzed. The new model 95% decreases time of experts who will review medical records to expose AEs.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This study did not receive any funding

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Medical Ethics Committee of Anadolu Medical Center (Anadolu Saglik Merkezi) / Turkey gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • 1 Sources of Support: We thank Anadolu Medical Center (Anadolu Saglik Merkezi) for supporting this project and sharing related data.

  • 2 Type of The Paper: Ahmet Murat Sumer is an Industrial Engineering PhD Student in Istanbul Technical University, Turkey. This paper is created within the scope of the dissertation. The dissertation is named as “Developing a Process Mining-Based Model for Detecting Patient Safety Errors in Healthcare”. Assoc. Professor Cemil Ceylan is the advisor of this PhD dissertation. This dissertation has not been finished, yet.

  • Email: msumer{at}itu.edu.tr, Email: ceylan{at}itu.edu.tr;

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted September 23, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A Process-Mining Model to Detect Adverse Postoperative Blood Transfusions
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
A Process-Mining Model to Detect Adverse Postoperative Blood Transfusions
Ahmet Murat Sumer, Cemil Ceylan
medRxiv 2022.09.21.22280177; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280177
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
A Process-Mining Model to Detect Adverse Postoperative Blood Transfusions
Ahmet Murat Sumer, Cemil Ceylan
medRxiv 2022.09.21.22280177; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.21.22280177

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (230)
  • Allergy and Immunology (507)
  • Anesthesia (111)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1264)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (207)
  • Dermatology (148)
  • Emergency Medicine (283)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (538)
  • Epidemiology (10056)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (502)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2486)
  • Geriatric Medicine (240)
  • Health Economics (482)
  • Health Informatics (1653)
  • Health Policy (757)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (638)
  • Hematology (250)
  • HIV/AIDS (538)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11896)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (627)
  • Medical Education (255)
  • Medical Ethics (75)
  • Nephrology (269)
  • Neurology (2304)
  • Nursing (140)
  • Nutrition (354)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (458)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (537)
  • Oncology (1259)
  • Ophthalmology (377)
  • Orthopedics (134)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (158)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (326)
  • Pediatrics (737)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (315)
  • Primary Care Research (282)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2295)
  • Public and Global Health (4850)
  • Radiology and Imaging (846)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (493)
  • Respiratory Medicine (657)
  • Rheumatology (289)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (241)
  • Sports Medicine (228)
  • Surgery (273)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (131)
  • Urology (100)