Abstract
Albuminuria is used for chronic kidney disease (CKD) screening, diagnosis, staging, and monitoring. A change in albuminuria has been proposed as a surrogate outcome for CKD progression. High glucose concentration interferes with Jaffe serum creatinine assays but the extent to which glycosuria biases measurement of urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (uACR) is uncertain. Any interference would have implications as the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors increases. We performed laboratory-based interference studies on urine samples from 333 adults with CKD stages 3-4. Samples were separated into four aliquots: a reference aliquot and three aliquots spiked with increasing concentrations of glucose solution representing the range expected in patients taking SGLT-2 inhibitors (28, 111 and 333 mmol/L). uACR was assayed using Jaffe and enzymatic methods. Median (Q1-Q3) uACR in reference samples was 63 (17-150) mg/mmol. Glucose spiking did not interfere with uACR estimation using enzymatic creatinine assays. For the Jaffe assay, the presence of 28 mmol/L of glucose resulted in a -1.5% mean bias in uACR (95% confidence interval -1.9 to -1.1%) which increased to a -2.5% bias (−3.2 to -1.9%) at a concentration of 333 mmol/L. Overestimation of urinary creatinine concentration increased substantially with decreasing creatinine concentration (i.e. dilute urine). In this cohort, interference of the Jaffe assay by glucose spiking resulted in 2-5% of uACR samples having a ≥10% spurious reduction in uACR (on its original scale). Given the increasing use of SGLT-2 inhibitors, we suggest uACR measured using Jaffe creatinine assays should be avoided.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical (Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 2 [13/EM/0434]) and regulatory approvals were obtained before the enrollment of any study participants.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript.