Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

How Have Global Scientists Responded to Tackling COVID-19?

View ORCID ProfileLongbing Cao, Wenfeng Hou
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278871
Longbing Cao
Data Science Lab, University of Technology Sydney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Longbing Cao
  • For correspondence: longbing.cao{at}gmail.com
Wenfeng Hou
Data Science Lab, University of Technology Sydney
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Since the outbreak of COVID-19, the global scientific communities across almost all countries have made urgent, intensive, and continuous effort on understanding, fighting and modeling the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 research turns out to be the first overwhelming global scientific reaction to significant global crises and threats. This literature analysis report collects and summarizes the profiles, trends, quality and impact of this global scientific response. It collects and analyzes 346,267 scientific references in English, involving researchers from 189 countries and regions in 27 subject areas. The report generates a picture of how global scientists have responded to COVID-19 between Jan 2020 and Mar 2022 in terms of their publication quantity, impact, focused major problems, and research areas and methods over country/region, discipline and time and collaboratively. The report also captures broad-reaching distributions and trends of modeling COVID-19 by AI, data science, analytics, shallow and deep machine learning, epidemic modeling, applied mathematics, and social science methods, etc. We further show the correlations between publication quality and quantity and economic status and COVID-19 infections globally and in major countries and regions. The literature analysis results of this global scientific response to COVID-19 present a comprehensive global, regional and subject-specific picture of the significant cross-disciplinary, cross-country, cross-problem, and cross-technique profiles and differences of the COVID-19 publication quantity and quality. The report also discloses significant imbalances in the COVID-19 research across countries/regions, subject areas, problems, topics, methods, research collaborations, and economic statuses. We share the source and analytical data of this global literature analysis for further research on this unprecedented and future crises.

The COVID-19 global scientists response dataset The COVID-19 global scientists response dataset supporting this report can be found in Kaggle at:

https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/datascienceslab/covid19-global-scientists-response

Citation of this report Longbing Cao and Wenfeng Hou. How have global scientists responded to tackling COVID-19? Full technical report, Data Science Lab, University of Technology Sydney, 2022.

More information about COVID-19 modeling Interested readers may refer to the following review on modeling COVID-19 which complements this global literature analysis:

Longbing Cao and Qing Liu, COVID-19 Modeling: A Review, 1-102, 2021 (version 2). Accessible at arXiv: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12556 or SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3899127.

More information about COVID-19 modeling, including the analytical results of this report and data and review on COVID-19 can be found at:

https://datasciences.org/covid19-modeling.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work is partially sponsored by the Australian Research Council Discovery grant DP190101079 and the ARC Future Fellowship grant FT190100734.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data of global scientific response to COVID-19 is available at https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/datascienceslab/covid19-global-scientists-response and https://datasciences.org/covid19-modeling/.

https://datasciences.org/covid19-modeling/

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted August 18, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Have Global Scientists Responded to Tackling COVID-19?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
How Have Global Scientists Responded to Tackling COVID-19?
Longbing Cao, Wenfeng Hou
medRxiv 2022.08.16.22278871; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278871
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
How Have Global Scientists Responded to Tackling COVID-19?
Longbing Cao, Wenfeng Hou
medRxiv 2022.08.16.22278871; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.08.16.22278871

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (576)
  • Allergy and Immunology (868)
  • Anesthesia (306)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (4483)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (449)
  • Dermatology (385)
  • Emergency Medicine (615)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1528)
  • Epidemiology (15283)
  • Forensic Medicine (31)
  • Gastroenterology (1134)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (6651)
  • Geriatric Medicine (671)
  • Health Economics (1006)
  • Health Informatics (4606)
  • Health Policy (1378)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1624)
  • Hematology (545)
  • HIV/AIDS (1276)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (15965)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (1111)
  • Medical Education (626)
  • Medical Ethics (147)
  • Nephrology (675)
  • Neurology (6699)
  • Nursing (346)
  • Nutrition (1006)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (1153)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (961)
  • Oncology (3370)
  • Ophthalmology (989)
  • Orthopedics (370)
  • Otolaryngology (421)
  • Pain Medicine (437)
  • Palliative Medicine (131)
  • Pathology (670)
  • Pediatrics (1704)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (700)
  • Primary Care Research (717)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (5497)
  • Public and Global Health (9288)
  • Radiology and Imaging (2225)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1375)
  • Respiratory Medicine (1202)
  • Rheumatology (598)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (721)
  • Sports Medicine (536)
  • Surgery (722)
  • Toxicology (100)
  • Transplantation (290)
  • Urology (267)