Abstract
Background Contemporary sports nutrition guidelines recognize that endurance athletes should periodize their daily carbohydrate (CHO) intake according to the demands of their training and competitive schedule. However, objective assessments of the dietary CHO periodization practices adopted by endurance athletes during prolonged training periods are not readily available.
Objectives To objectively assess the magnitude of the CHO periodization practices adopted by endurance athletes via the formulation of a novel CHO Periodization Index (CPI). The CPI is proposed to represent a single metric to quantify how tightly an athlete’s CHO intake is matched with training load, the magnitude of adjustment, and how frequently these adjustments occur.
Methods Self-selected training and dietary intake was reported daily by 55 endurance athletes (61.8% male) for 12 weeks (representing a total of 4,395 days of dietary assessments). Calculations were made for correlations between daily CHO intake and training load (product of session rating of perceived exertion and duration), CHO monotony (mean daily CHO intake divided by SD), CHO range (highest minus lowest single-day intake), and the CPI (correlation * range / monotony). Sub-group analysis was also performed to examine differences in CPI, frequency of fasted training sessions, and weekly training volume based on competitive level, habitual diet, and sex.
Results Mean participant daily CHO intake was 3.9 ± 1.5 (range 1.2 to 7.2) g/kg, with the highest single-day intake being 17.6 g/kg. Mean CHO range was 6.6 ± 3.1 (range 2.0 to 15.2) g/kg. Carbohydrate monotony values ranged from 1.0 to 6.0. Pearson correlations between training load and daily CHO intake ranged from −0.34 to 0.87. Mean CPI was 1.0 ± 1.2 (range - 1.2 to 5.6) and was higher among the highest-level athletes.
Conclusion Endurance athletes do not readily adjust daily CHO intake according to the demands of training. Furthermore, the CPI represents a promising tool that that can be used by researchers, coaches, and athletes to quantify CHO periodization practices and compare within and between individuals.
Key Points
It is recommended that endurance athletes adjust their daily carbohydrate intake according to variations in exercise volume and intensity, but there is limited knowledge of how this is being applied by athletes, and limited methods for quantifying or assessing the variations in intake.
We introduce a novel Carbohydrate Periodization Index (CPI), a single metric to capture how tightly an athlete’s carbohydrate intake is adjusted based on training load, the magnitude of adjustment, and how frequently these adjustments occur.
Data demonstrate that many endurance athletes do not follow recommended practices of adjustment in daily carbohydrate intake, or if they do, the magnitude of adjustment is small relative to changes in training volume and/or intensity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this article.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All study protocols and materials were approved by the Auckland University of Technology Ethics Committee (22/7).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The R code used in this analysis is publicly available at (https://github.com/Jeffrothschild/CPI_code).