Abstract
Background Deficiency in contextual and enhanced responding in cued fear learning may contribute to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). We examined the responses to aversive Pavlovian conditioning with an unpredictable spatial context as conditioned stimulus compared to a predictable context. We hypothesized that the PTSD group would depict less hippocampal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) activation during acquisition and extinction of unpredictable contexts and an overreactive amygdala response in the predictable contexts compared to controls.
Methods A novel combined differential cue-context conditioning paradigm was applied using virtual reality with spatial contexts that required configural as well as cue processing. We assessed 20 patients with PTSD, 21 healthy trauma-exposed (TC) and 22 non-trauma-exposed (HC) participants using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), skin conductance responses and self-report measures.
Results During fear acquisition patients with PTSD compared to TC showed lower activity in the hippocampi in the unpredictable and higher activity in the amygdalae in the predictable context. During fear extinction, patients compared to TC showed lower brain activity in the vmPFC in the predictable context. There were no significant differences in self-report or skin conductance responses among the groups.
Conclusions Our results suggest that patients with PTSD differ in brain activation from controls in regions such as the hippocampus, the amygdala and the vmPFC in the processing of unpredictable and predictable contexts. Deficient encoding of more complex configurations might lead to a preponderance of cue-based predictions in PTSD. Exposure-based treatments need to focus on improving predictability of contextual processing and reducing enhanced cue reactivity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB636/C1 to H.F).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki, 2013) and was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University. A all participants gave written informed consent.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Author Note: All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The datasets and scripts for analyses are made available online. Readers seeking further information are welcome to contact the corresponding author.
↵+ shared last authorshipmailto:
Previous Presentation: Siehl, S. (2021). Structural and functional neuroplasticity in posttraumatic stress disorder: fear learning and context processing. [doctoral thesis, University of Mannheim]. https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de
Poster presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping in 2021, online due to Covid-19 restrictions, 21.06-25.06.2021
Data Availability
We report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all inclusion/exclusion criteria, whether inclusion/exclusion criteria were established prior to data analysis, all manipulations, and all measures in the study. Ethical restrictions to protect participant confidentiality prevent us from making study data publicly available. This also refers to the analysis/experimental code, and any other digital materials, where participant-related information (like sex or psychopathological status) are also included. Readers seeking access to the study data and materials should contact the corresponding author based on a formal collaboration agreement. This formal collaboration agreement indicates that data will be shared with other researchers who agree to work with the authors, and for the sole purpose of verifying the claims in the paper. The data and materials will be released to requestors after approval of this formal collaboration agreement by the local Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty Mannheim.
