Abstract
Background The safety of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is unknown in children aged <5 years. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the safety of BNT162b2 vaccine used off-label in children of this age group in Germany.
Methods An investigator-initiated retrospective cohort study (CoVacU5) included parents or caregivers having children aged <5 years registered for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in outpatient care facilities in Germany. Reported short-term safety data of 1-3 doses of 3-10µg BNT162b2 in children aged 0 to <60 months are presented. Co-primary outcomes were the frequencies of 11 categories of symptoms post-vaccination with bivariate analyses and regression models adjusting for age, sex, weight and height. On-label non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines served as controls in an active-comparator design.
Results The study included 7806 of 19,000 registered children representing a 41% response rate. 338 children received the first dose of BNT162b2 at age 0-<12 months, n=1272 at age 12-24 months and n=5629 at age ≥24 to <60 months. A 10µg dosage was more frequently associated with injection-site symptoms compared to lower dosages. The probability of any symptoms (OR: 1.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-1.94]), injection-site, musculoskeletal, dermatological or otolaryngological symptom categories were modestly elevated after BNT12b2 compared to non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, whereas the probabilities of general symptoms (OR: 0.74 [95% CI: 0.64-0.85]) and fever (OR: 0.43 [95% CI: 0.35-0.51]) were lower after BNT162b2. Symptoms requiring hospitalization (n=10) were reported only at BNT162b2 dosages higher than 3µg.
Conclusions The symptoms reported after BNT162b2 administration were overall comparable to on-label non-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this cohort of children aged <5 years. (German Clinical Trials Register ID: DRKS00028759).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
The present study was performed without specific project funding. Work of CMC was supported by University Medical Center Rostock. Work of DD, MJ, NT and RB were supported by University Medical Center Dresden. JM was funded by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences and the Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine. MBM was supported by University Hospital Bern and by the program National Competence Center of Research-Kidney.CH
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethics Committee of the University of Rostock, Germany gave ethical approval for this work (ID: A 2022-0065).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The raw data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request, provided that a positive evaluation by the pertinent ethics committee is available and German data protection laws are followed.
