Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Classifying sex with MRI

Matthis Ebel, Martin Lotze, Martin Domin, Nicola Neumann, View ORCID ProfileMario Stanke
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.27.22274355
Matthis Ebel
aUniversity of Greifswald, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Greifswald 17489, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Lotze
bUniversity Medicine Greifswald, Functional Imaging, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Greifswald 17489, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Domin
bUniversity Medicine Greifswald, Functional Imaging, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Greifswald 17489, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Neumann
bUniversity Medicine Greifswald, Functional Imaging, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, Greifswald 17489, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mario Stanke
aUniversity of Greifswald, Institute of Mathematics and Computer Science, Greifswald 17489, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mario Stanke
  • For correspondence: mario.stanke@uni-greifswald.de
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sex differences in the size of specific brain structures have been extensively studied but careful and reproducible statistical hypothesis testing to identify them produced overall small effect sizes and differences brains of males and females. On the other hand, multivariate statistical or machine learning methods that analyse MR images of the whole brain have reported respectable accuracies for the task of distinguishing males from females. However, most existing studies lacked a careful control for brain volume differences between sexes and, if done, their accuracy often declined to 70% or below. This raises questions on the relevance of accuracies achieved without careful control of overall volume. Also the potential applicability is uncertain insofar as the robustness of methods had rarely been tested or they suffered from poor accuracy when applied on a different cohort.

We examined how accurately sex can be classified with multivariate methods from gray matter properties of the human brain when correcting for overall brain volume. We also tested, how robust machine learning classifiers are when predicting cross-cohort, i.e. when they are used on a different cohort than they were trained on. Further, we studied how their accuracy depends on the size of the training set. MRI data was used from two population based data sets of 3308 mostly older adults from the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) and 1113 mostly younger adults from the Human Connectome Project (HCP), respectively. Our new open source program BraiNN is based on a 3D convolutional neural network and was compared with a simple logistic regression approach.

When using the gold standard method of matching male and female participants for total intracranial volume, BraiNN achieved 86% accuracy when predicting sex on the same (SHIP) cohort and 73% accuracy when cross-predicting on the HCP cohort. Logistic regression achieved an accuracy >90% on the SHIP cohort, but required a large number of training examples to perform well and did not generalize well across cohorts. On the other hand, BraiNN lost less than 2% accuracy when the cohort size was reduced from 3308 to 1274.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This project had been supported by a starter grand from "Nordeutsche Universitaeten" and funds for digital education from the German Pact for Higher Education.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics Committee of the University Medicine Greifswald gave ethical approval for this work

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The source code of BraiNN is available from GitHub.

https://github.com/mabl3/BraiNN

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 28, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Classifying sex with MRI
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Classifying sex with MRI
Matthis Ebel, Martin Lotze, Martin Domin, Nicola Neumann, Mario Stanke
medRxiv 2022.04.27.22274355; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.27.22274355
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Classifying sex with MRI
Matthis Ebel, Martin Lotze, Martin Domin, Nicola Neumann, Mario Stanke
medRxiv 2022.04.27.22274355; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.27.22274355

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Radiology and Imaging
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (160)
  • Allergy and Immunology (412)
  • Anesthesia (90)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (855)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (157)
  • Dermatology (97)
  • Emergency Medicine (247)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (392)
  • Epidemiology (8542)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (383)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1741)
  • Geriatric Medicine (167)
  • Health Economics (371)
  • Health Informatics (1235)
  • Health Policy (618)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (467)
  • Hematology (196)
  • HIV/AIDS (372)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10274)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (552)
  • Medical Education (192)
  • Medical Ethics (51)
  • Nephrology (210)
  • Neurology (1668)
  • Nursing (97)
  • Nutrition (248)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (325)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (450)
  • Oncology (925)
  • Ophthalmology (263)
  • Orthopedics (100)
  • Otolaryngology (172)
  • Pain Medicine (111)
  • Palliative Medicine (40)
  • Pathology (252)
  • Pediatrics (534)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (246)
  • Primary Care Research (207)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1760)
  • Public and Global Health (3831)
  • Radiology and Imaging (622)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (318)
  • Respiratory Medicine (518)
  • Rheumatology (207)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (165)
  • Sports Medicine (157)
  • Surgery (190)
  • Toxicology (36)
  • Transplantation (100)
  • Urology (74)