Abstract
Introduction Stenosis of an organ/tissue primary artery may produce ischemia, malfunction or only reduce blood flow reserve. Despite incomplete hemodynamic understanding of critical arterial stenosis, degree of diameter stenosis continues to be an index for patient management. This study aims to use conservation of energy to; quantitate the arterial pressure gradient produced by stenosis, determine organ/tissue perfusion pressure, blood flow and reserve as a function of degree of diameter stenosis and identify critical diameter stenosis, if it exists.
Methods A three-component system is considered, parallel stenotic artery and collateral circulation supplying organ/tissue. Energy analysis of arterial stenosis gives the pressure gradient produced and stenosis vascular resistance. Organs/tissues intrinsically autoregulate blood flow when perfusion pressure is greater than threshold value. System energy analysis defines collateral vascular resistance and gives perfusion pressure, blood flow and reserve as a function of diameter stenosis. Renal and internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis provide numerical examples.
Results The magnitude of stenosis energy dissipation, K, is a fourth power function of stenosis diameter with a steep slope between 65% and 80%, (K = 67 to 625). Systems without collaterals, C = 0, have discrete critical stenosis values within this range. Renal critical stenosis is 74% (K = 233). Systems with poor collaterals, C < 1, have critical stenosis from 65% to 99% depending on collateral magnitude. Critical ICA stenosis begins at 70% and up to 99%, (K = 132 to ∞). Degree of cerebral ischemia is non-linearly inversely proportional to collateral magnitude,C. Systems with good collateral circulation, C > 1, do not have critical stenosis, including the ICA (cerebral hemisphere). In these systems stenosis progression reduces blood flow reserve but does not produce ischemia.
Conclusion Critical diameter arterial stenosis may or may not exist for specific organ/tissue systems depending on the magnitude of collateral circulation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflict of interest statement: This research did not receive any specific grant or funding agencies in the public, or non-profit sectors.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript