Abstract
Introduction Prescribing naloxone is recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to reduce the risk of death from an opioid overdose. Naloxone is rarely prescribed, even when indicated; improving our understanding of how primary care providers (PCP) perceive their role in naloxone prescribing is essential to increase opioid medication safety. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe how PCPs perceive their role in prescribing naloxone for patients who are at high risk of an overdose and (2) describe PCP-reported barriers and facilitators of naloxone prescribing.
Methods Currently practicing providers completed semi-structured interviews, based on Theory of Planned Behavior, to understand their attitudes toward naloxone, their perceived role in naloxone prescribing, and facilitators/barriers to prescribing naloxone.
Results Eleven interviews were conducted with physicians (n=2), physician assistants (n=8), and a nurse practitioner (n=1). Providers held generally positive attitudes toward naloxone as a ‘rescue’ medication. Negative attitudes toward naloxone include the perception of facilitating risky opioid use. Providers suggested that whomever prescribes the opioid pain medication should be primarily responsible for prescribing naloxone. Providers noted that stigma may prevent them from discussing naloxone during clinic visits. Increasing visit time and receiving support/education from organizational and professional society leadership were identified as important facilitators of naloxone prescribing.
Conclusions While providers were aware of what naloxone was used for, there was reticence in discussing this medication with patients. Providers reported that whomever prescribes a pain medication should be primarily responsible for ensuring medication safety. If primary care organizations would like to improve opioid medication safety, ensuring that providers feel supported and receive needed education are essential.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), National Institutes of Health, through Grant Award Number UL1TR001420.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The IRB of Wake Forest School of Medicine gave ethical approval for this work.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.