Abstract
Objective Research processes are opening to stakeholders beyond the scientific community. We analyse the user involvement in the definition of research priorities in the field of mental health. Mental disorders represent a significant disease burden at a global scale and their identification and treatment involves caregivers, patients and related social groups such as family and friends. Therefore it is an area conducive to the application of participatory methods in priority setting. We present a scoping review of participatory methods in mental health priority setting for the period 2010-2020 to shed light on their spread and characteristics, the types of groups involved and the link with the priorities identified.
Methods First we describe the eligibility criteria for the scoping review. We selected peer-reviewed documents published between 2010 and 2020 using MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, the Core Collection of the Web of Science and Scopus, applying controlled terms of search. We initially identified 330 documents from which we selected seventy-four after further discarding studies that were not specifically addressing priority setting in mental disorders research. We noted and classified the interest groups participating in every study.
Results Priority setting partnerships are becoming the most frequent participatory instruments for priority setting in mental health. We identify regional differences in the extent to which such methods are being applied. When research beneficiaries participate in priority setting, prioritised research focuses on therapy, standards, education and psychology of mental disorders. When participation is limited to scientists, therapy, diagnosis, methods and standards, receive more attention.
- mental disorders
- research priorities setting
- scoping review
- research partnerships
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under project MAPAMENT (PRE2018-084855)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are provided in the supplementary material accompanying the manuscrpit