ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of an raw and filtered acceleration time-series data from an instrumented mouthguard system against an anthropometric testing device. Testing was conducted in a laboratory using a standard impact protocol utilising the head-form of reference system and the mouthguard system. Testing occurred at 5 impact locations: facemask, front, oblique, side and back, and at four velocities (3.6, 5.5, 7.4, and 9.3 m/s) to attain a total of 55 impacts. A 160 Hz Low-pass 4th order Butterworth filter was applied to the time-series data, and was reported as raw and filtered. Peak linear acceleration, peak rotational velocity and peak rotational acceleration was statistically compared to the reference measurement system. Total concordance correlation coefficient was 90.7% and 96.9%, for raw and filtered data set. Raw and filtered had intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.85 and 0.95 for peak linear acceleration, 0.99 and 0.99 for peak rotational velocity and 0.94 and 0.95 peak rotational acceleration respectively. The instrumented mouthguard displayed high accuracy when measuring head impact kinematics in a laboratory setting. The results presented in this study provide the basis on which the instrumented mouthguard can be further developed for deployment and application within sport quantify head impact collision dynamics in order to optimise performance and brain health.
Competing Interest Statement
There was no financial support provided for this study; however, a financial relationship exists between Sports and Wellbeing analytics Limited (SWA) and Swansea University. The PROTECHT system has been developed by SWA and authors from both SWA and Swansea University are included in this current paper. CJ is employed by SWA. The data for this study was collected independently by Stanford University, from which the author from Swansea University performed all the data processing and analysis of the results and takes full responsibility for their integrity and analysis.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript