ABSTRACT
Background In 2016, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued “CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain”. The guideline used data from 1999 to 2010 that related Opioid Sales to Opiate Treatment Admissions (a measure of drug addiction rates) Opioid Deaths. The CDC’s analysis indicated that opioid prescriptions are directly correlated1-8 with drug addiction and overdose mortality outcomes. As a result, prescription opioid sales have been curtailed, making it difficult for sufferers of severe chronic pain to access an effective treatment option. In this paper, the relationships between opioid sales, drug addiction, and opioid deaths are reexamined using data from 2010 to 2019.
Methods Linear regression models were fit to each response separately. Opioid sales (measured as MME per capita) was the independent variable. Total overdose deaths (TOD), any opioid overdose deaths (AOD), prescription opioid overdose deaths (POD) and opiate treatment admissions (OTA) were the dependent, response variables. The models were assessed using three criteria: the statistical significance of the model (Overall P-Value), the quality of the fit (R2), and the sign of the slope coefficient.
Results The analyses revealed that the direct correlations (significant, positive slopes) reported by the CDC based on data from 1999 to 2010 no longer exist based on data from 2010 to 2019. The relationships either have reversed (i.e., significant negative slopes) or are non-existent (no significant model).
Conclusions The basis for the CDC guideline no longer holds. The guideline should be updated or annulled based on the current relationships that have existed for a decade. This is especially relevant for people suffering from severe, chronic pain, whose access to prescription opioids has been severely curtailed under the current guideline and to ensure that government resources are directed to an effective approach to reducing overdose deaths.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All data sources are included with links in the attachment under the heading DESCRIPTION OF DATA SOURCES.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
