Abstract
Background It is critical to monitor changes in vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 outcomes for various vaccine products in different population subgroups.
Methods We conducted a retrospective study in patients ≥12 years who underwent testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus from April 1 - October 25, 2021 at urgent care centers in the New York City metropolitan area. Patients self-reported vaccination status at the time of testing. We used a test-negative design to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) by comparing odds of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated (n=484,468), partially vaccinated (n=107,573), and unvaccinated (n=466,452) patients, adjusted for demographic factors and calendar time.
Results VE against symptomatic infection after 2 doses of mRNA vaccines was 96% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 95%, 97%) in the pre-delta period and reduced to 79% (95% CI: 77%, 81%) in the delta period. In the delta period, VE for 12–15-year-olds (85%; [95% CI: 81%, 89%]) was higher compared to older age groups (<65% for all other age groups). VE estimates did not differ by sex, race/ethnicity, and comorbidity. VE against symptomatic infection was the highest for individuals with a prior infection followed by full vaccination. VE against symptomatic infection after the mRNA-1273 vaccine (83% [95% CI: 81%, 84%]) was higher compared to the BNT162b2 vaccine (76% [95% CI: 74%, 78%]) in the delta period. VE after the single-dose Ad26.COV2.S vaccine was the lowest compared to other vaccines (29% [95% CI: 26%, 32%]) in the delta period.
Conclusions VE against infection after two doses of the mRNA vaccine was high initially, but significantly reduced against the delta variant for all three FDA-approved vaccines.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Funding for this project is provided by the CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (cunyisph.org)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the City University of New York. Patient consent was not obtained because de-identified electronic health records were used.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data may be available upon reasonable request submitted to CityMD/ Summit Health due to privacy/ethical restrictions in using electronic medical records.