Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Understanding the immunological landscape of England during SARS-CoV2 Omicron variant wave

View ORCID ProfileJoseph Shingleton, View ORCID ProfileSteven Dyke, Archie Herrick, Thomas Finnie
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.21.22271270
Joseph Shingleton
1UK Health Security Agency, PHAGE Joint Modelling Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Joseph Shingleton
Steven Dyke
1UK Health Security Agency, PHAGE Joint Modelling Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Steven Dyke
Archie Herrick
1UK Health Security Agency, PHAGE Joint Modelling Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Finnie
1UK Health Security Agency, PHAGE Joint Modelling Team
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Understanding the scale of the threat posed by SARS-CoV2 B.1.1.529, or Omicron, variant formed a key problem in public health in the early part of 2022. Early evidence indicated that the variant was more transmissible and less severe than previous variants. As the virus was expected to spread quickly through the population of England, it was important that some understanding of the immunological landscape of the country was developed. This paper attempts to estimate the number of people with good immunity to the Omicron variant, defined as either recent infection with two doses of vaccine, or two doses of vaccine with a recent booster dose. To achieve this, we use a process of iterative proportional fitting to estimate the cell values of a contingency table, using national immunisation records and real-time model infection estimates as marginal values. Our results indicate that, despite the increased risk of immune evasion with the Omicron variant, a high proportion of England’s population had good immunity to the virus, particularly in older age groups. However, low rates of immunity in younger populations may allow endemic infection to persist for some time.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

All authros are funded through the UK Government Department for Health and Social Care grant in aid funding to the UK health Security Agency

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The UK Health Security Agency have provided ethical approval for the research described in this article.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • ↵† Joseph.shingleton{at}phe.gov.uk

Data Availability

Vaccination data are from the National Immunisation Managment Service (NIMS) database and are not publically avaialable. This is currently managed by NHS England, and appropriate access can be required via https://digital.nhs.uk/coronavirus/vaccinations/training-and-onboarding/point-of-care/national-immunisation-management-service-nims-app. Estimates for COVID-19 infections are taken from the UKHSA-Cambridge COVID-19 infection model. This is currently managed by both the UK Health Security Agency and Cambridge MRC Bio Statistics Unit. The data are not publically available.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted February 22, 2022.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding the immunological landscape of England during SARS-CoV2 Omicron variant wave
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Understanding the immunological landscape of England during SARS-CoV2 Omicron variant wave
Joseph Shingleton, Steven Dyke, Archie Herrick, Thomas Finnie
medRxiv 2022.02.21.22271270; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.21.22271270
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Understanding the immunological landscape of England during SARS-CoV2 Omicron variant wave
Joseph Shingleton, Steven Dyke, Archie Herrick, Thomas Finnie
medRxiv 2022.02.21.22271270; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.21.22271270

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Public and Global Health
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (227)
  • Allergy and Immunology (500)
  • Anesthesia (110)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1226)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (205)
  • Dermatology (147)
  • Emergency Medicine (282)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (528)
  • Epidemiology (9998)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (497)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2441)
  • Geriatric Medicine (236)
  • Health Economics (479)
  • Health Informatics (1634)
  • Health Policy (750)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (633)
  • Hematology (247)
  • HIV/AIDS (530)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11854)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (625)
  • Medical Education (251)
  • Medical Ethics (74)
  • Nephrology (267)
  • Neurology (2271)
  • Nursing (139)
  • Nutrition (349)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (451)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (532)
  • Oncology (1244)
  • Ophthalmology (375)
  • Orthopedics (133)
  • Otolaryngology (226)
  • Pain Medicine (154)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (324)
  • Pediatrics (728)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (311)
  • Primary Care Research (281)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2279)
  • Public and Global Health (4822)
  • Radiology and Imaging (833)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (488)
  • Respiratory Medicine (650)
  • Rheumatology (283)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (237)
  • Sports Medicine (224)
  • Surgery (266)
  • Toxicology (44)
  • Transplantation (124)
  • Urology (99)