Abstract
Objective To identify GP surgeries with unexpected rates of referral to specialist services, using headache referrals to outpatient neurology as an example. Identifying surgeries with unexpectedly high or low referral rates allows for further investigation and potential support to be targeted where it is most likely to be effective.
Methods This is a retrospective observational study using routinely collected and open-source data. Data was collected from a single consultant outpatient neurology clinic and 202 GP surgeries across seven CCGs in the Northwest of England. The number of headache referrals from each GP surgery during a study period of 3 ¼ years was used as the primary outcome in a poisson model. The standardised residuals from this model were then used to identify GP surgeries that were likely to have referred unexpected patient numbers for headaches to an outpatient neurology clinic during the study period.
Results We identified four GP surgeries with unexpected numbers of referrals. This model also showed that there were two main predictors of headache referral, namely other neurology referrals and the distance of the GP surgery from the outpatient clinic.
Conclusion GP surgeries with unexpected numbers of referrals to specialist services were identified using a flexible methodology. This methodology was demonstrated using headache referrals but could be adapted to any type of referral or geographical area.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Fran Biggin is funded by an EPSRC doctoral training partnership grant number EP/R513076/1. The funder of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
HRA approval granted on 30 May 2019 (Ref: 255676). Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine Research Ethics Committee approval granted on 17 June 2019 (Ref: FHMREC18092).
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵# HE and JK are joint senior authors
Introduction and discussion updated following revisions suggested by reviewers.
Data Availability
Due to patient data confidentiality and restrictions imposed by the HRA we are unable to directly share the data for this study. Anyone wishing to access this data must apply to do so through the HRA by completing an IRAS application.
