Abstract
Background After admission to hospital, COVID-19 progresses in a substantial proportion of patients to critical disease that requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission.
Methods In a pragmatic, non-blinded trial, 387 patients aged 40-90 years were randomised to receive treatment with SoC plus doxycycline (n=192) or SoC only (n=195). The primary outcome was the need for ICU admission as judged by the attending physicians. Three types of analyses were carried out for the primary outcome: “Intention to treat” (ITT) based on randomisation; “Per protocol” (PP), excluding patients not treated according to randomisation; and “As treated” (AT), based on actual treatment received. The trial was undertaken in six hospitals in India with high-quality ICU facilities. An online application serving as the electronic case report form was developed to enable screening, randomisation and collection of outcomes data.
Results Adherence to treatment per protocol was 95.1%. Among all 387 participants, 77 (19.9%) developed critical disease needing ICU admission. In all three primary outcome analyses, doxycycline was associated with a relative risk reduction (RRR) and absolute risk reduction (ARR): ITT 31.6% RRR, 7.4% ARR (P=0.063); PP 40.7% RRR, 9.6% ARR (P=0.017); AT 43.2% RRR, 10.8% ARR (P=0.007), with numbers needed to treat (NTT) of 13.4 (ITT), 10.4 (PP), and 9.3 (AT), respectively. Doxycycline was well tolerated with not a single patient stopping treatment due to adverse events.
Conclusions In hospitalized COVID-19 patients, doxycycline, a safe, inexpensive, and widely available antibiotic with anti-inflammatory properties, reduces the need for ICU admission when added to SoC.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
CTRI202105033867
Clinical Protocols
https://cmri.ckbirlahospitals.com/Study_Protocol_DOXPREVENT.pdf
Funding Statement
This study received an unrestricted grant (Rs 500,000.00, corresponding to approx. USD 6730.00) from the pharmaceutical company, Cipla (Mumbai, India)(Study code IIS/11/20) to support a part-time salary of a study coordinator who assisted the Chief Investigator. Cipla had no role in the trial design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the manuscript. No external funding was received for any other work related to this trial.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Institutional Ethics Committees of (1) The Calcutta Medical Research Institute, Kolkata, and (2) The Poona Medical Research Foundation, Pune, gave ethical approval for this work
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
↵* joint first authors;
↵# joint senior authors;
Section on secondary outcomes complemented to include the following results/analysis: ,30 of 195 patients randomized to SoC and 16 of 192 patients randomized to SoC+Doxy were actually admitted to ICU (OR 0.5000, 95% CI 0.2629 to 0.9510, p 0.0346). Among the 204 patients who were actually treated with SoC, 34 (16.7%) were admitted to ICU, compared to 12 of 183 (6.6%) patients treated with SoC plus doxycycline (OR 0.3509, 95% CI 0.1757 to 0.7006, p 0.003). Among patients requiring ICU treatment as judged by their treating physicians, 34 of 51 (66.7%) treated with SoC compared to 12 of 26 (46.2%) treated with SoC plus doxycycline were admitted to ICU (Figure 2).-
Data Availability
All data produced are available online at GitHub the following data repository: https://github.com/PuzzledFace/DoxyICU_Results
