Abstract
Background Patients with head and neck malignancies are especially vulnerable to developing malnutrition, which has a significant impact on morbidity and mortality. Identification of high risk patients is hence critical for optimising outcomes.
Objective It is hypothesised that bioimpedance analysis (BIA) can provide information on nutritional status and risk of perioperative complications in a timely and accurate manner. The study objectives are; to correlate BIA parameters with Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) scores, and determine the association of BIA parameters with common perioperative complications in patients undergoing head and neck surgery.
Method This is a cohort study of 61 patients who were admitted for elective head and neck surgery from 2018-2019. Prior to surgery, patients were evaluated in a preoperative multidisciplinary allied health professional clinic for formal SGA scoring. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was performed using the Bodystat Quadscan 4000. One-way ANOVA and Fisher ‘s exact test were performed for associations between SGA and BIA parameters and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted for determination of optimal cut-off values of phase angle and Wellness marker in detecting malnutrition and perioperative pneumonia using Youden ‘s Index (YI).
Results 45 males and 16 females with mean ± SD age of 62 ± 1.6 years old were included in the study. Significant differences were observed in Wellness Marker (p=0.004) and phase angle (p=0.006) amongst patients in the 3 SGA categories. BIA parameters (p=0.011 and p=0.032 for Wellness Marker and phase angle respectively) were associated with perioperative pneumonia. No significant differences were observed for other perioperative complications namely surgical site infections, salivary leak/fistula, and flap complications.
Conclusion Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis is associated with Subjective Global Assessment and shows promise as a preoperative tool, in conjuction with SGA, to detect malnutrition in patients undergoing surgery for head and neck malignancies and highlight patients at risk of developing perioperative pneumonia.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was made possible by funding from the ACP Seed Grant. The ACP seed grant is funded by the SingHealth Duke-NUS Academic Medical Centre, facilitated by the Joint Office of Academic Medicine. It is an initiative of Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, sited at the Singapore General Hospital.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB) CIRB No. 2018/2234
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data cannot be shared publicly because of patient privacy policies of the institution. Data are available from the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board (CIRB) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.