Abstract
Introduction Health organisations should support healthcare workers who are physically and psychologically affected by patient safety incidents (second victims). There is a growing body of evidence which focusses on second victim support interventions. However, there is still limited research on the elements necessary to effectively implement and ensure the sustainability of these types of interventions. In this study, we propose to map and frame the key factors which underlie an effective implementation of healthcare worker support interventions in healthcare organisations when healthcare workers are physically and/or emotionally affected by patient safety incidents.
Methods and analysis This scoping review will be guided by the established methodological Arksey and O’Malley framework, Levac and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. We will follow the JBI three-step process: (1) a preliminary search conducted on two databases; (2) the definition of clear inclusion criteria and the creation of a list of search terms to be used in the subsequent running of the search on a larger number of databases; and (3) additional searches (cross-checking/cross-referencing of reference lists of eligible studies, hand-searching in target journals relevant to the topic, conference proceedings, institutional/organisational websites and networks repositories). We will undertake a comprehensive search strategy in relevant bibliographic databases (Pubmed/Medline, Embase, CINHAL, Web of Science, Scopus, PsycInfo, Epistemonikos, Scielo, Cochrane Library and Open Grey). We will use the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018 version for quality assessment of the eligible studies. Our scoping review will be guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR).
Ethics and dissemination This study will not require ethical approval. Results of the scoping review will be published in a peer-review journal and findings will be presented in scientific conferences as well as in international forums and other relevant dissemination channels.
This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io): 10.17605/OSF.IO/WZSE9
Strengths and limitations of this study
To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review to map and frame the different organisational, operational and contextual factors which underlie the implementation of health worker support programmes after the occurrence of a patient safety incident.
This scoping review uses a rigorous and transparent method for mapping the available evidence.
Given the broad focus of this scoping review, we don’t expect that eligible studies will show a direct relation between the key factors and the effectiveness of the implementation of the support interventions.
For better interpretation of the results, we will provide a quality assessment of the included studies, although quality assessment is not mandatory to include in scoping reviews.
We will involve key stakeholders as an additional source of information to complement the literature search.
Competing Interest Statement
This protocol is included in the PhD project of the corresponding author (SGP) previously approved by the National School of Public Health (ENSP- NOVA). Some of the research team members are part of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims (ERNST) - COST Action 19113. All the authors have completed the disclosure of interest form.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by FCT- Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, I. P. under the PhD grant UI/BD/150875/2021. It is also partly supported by Comprehensive Health Research Centre (CHRC) and National School of Public Health, NOVA University of Lisbon (ENSP- NOVA), under the funding support for publications.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript