Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Graph Theoretical Measures of Fast Ripples Support the Epileptic Network Hypothesis

Shennan A Weiss, Tomas Pastore, Iren Orosz, Daniel Rubinstein, Richard Gorniak, Zachary Waldman, Itzhak Fried, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan, Diego Slezak, Gregory Worrell, Jerome Engel Jr, Michael R. Sperling, Richard J Staba
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.22269492
Shennan A Weiss
1Dept. of Neurology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, 11203 USA
2Dept. of Physiology and Pharmacology, State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, New York, 11203 USA
3Dept. of Neurology, New York City Health + Hospitals/Kings County, Brooklyn, NY, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: shennanweiss@gmail.com
Tomas Pastore
4Dept. of Computer Science, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Iren Orosz
5Dept. of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel Rubinstein
10Depts. of Neurology and Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Gorniak
11Dept. of Neuroradiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary Waldman
10Depts. of Neurology and Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Itzhak Fried
6Dept. of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chengyuan Wu
12Dept. of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ashwini Sharan
12Dept. of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Diego Slezak
4Dept. of Computer Science, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory Worrell
13Dept. of Neurology, Mayo Systems Electrophysiology Laboratory (MSEL), USA
14Dept. of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerome Engel Jr
5Dept. of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
6Dept. of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
8Dept. of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
9Brain Research Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael R. Sperling
10Depts. of Neurology and Neuroscience, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard J Staba
5Dept. of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, 90095, USA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

The epileptic network hypothesis and epileptogenic zone (EZ) hypothesis are two theories of ictogenesis. The network hypothesis posits that coordinated activity among interconnected nodes produces seizures. The EZ hypothesis posits that distinct regions are necessary and sufficient for seizure generation. High-frequency oscillations (HFOs), and particularly fast ripples (FR), are thought to be biomarkers of the EZ. We sought to test these theories by comparing HFO rates and networks in surgical responders and non-responders, with no appreciable change in seizure frequency or severity, within a retrospective cohort of 48 patients implanted with stereo-EEG electrodes. We recorded inter-ictal activity during non-rapid eye movement sleep and semi- automatically detected and quantified HFOs. Each electrode contact was localized in normalized coordinates. We found that the accuracy of seizure-onset zone (SOZ) electrode contact classification using HFO rates (ripples 80-250 Hz, and FR 250-600 Hz) was not significantly different in surgical responders and non-responders, suggesting that in non-responders the EZ partially encompassed the SOZ(s) (p>0.05). We also found that in the responders, FR on oscillations exhibited a higher spectral content in the SOZ compared to the non-SOZ (p<1e-5). In contrast, in the non-responders the FR had a lower spectral content in the SOZ (p<1e-5). We constructed two different networks of FR with a spectral content > 350 Hz. The first was a rate- distance network that multiplied the Euclidian distance between FR generating contacts by the average rate of FR in the two contacts. The radius of the rate-distance network, which excluded SOZ nodes, discriminated non-responders, including patients not offered resection or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) due to diffuse multi-focal onsets, with an accuracy of 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.98]. The second FR network was constructed using the mutual information (MI) between the timing of the events to measure functional connectivity. For most non-responders, this network had a longer characteristic path length, lower mean local efficiency in the non-SOZ, and a higher nodal strength among non-SOZ nodes relative to SOZ nodes. The graphical theoretical measures from the rate-distance and MI networks of 22 non-RNS treated patients was used to train a support vector machine, which when tested on 13 distinct patients classified non-responders with an accuracy of 0.92 [95% CI 0.75-1]. These results support the epileptic network hypothesis, refute the EZ hypothesis, and suggest that surgical non-responders, and patients not selected for resection or RNS, exhibit a decentralized FR network consisting of widely distributed, hyperexcitable FR generating nodes.

Abbreviated Summary Weiss et al., report that fast ripples form a correlational network. In poor epilepsy surgery candidates, and patients that don’t respond to surgery, the networks are widespread, highly active, and decentralized. This can be used to plan effective surgeries and supports the theory that seizures require a coordinated epileptic network.

Graphical abstract

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was fully supported by NIH K23 NS094633, a Junior Investigator Award from the American Epilepsy Society (SAW), R01 NS106958 (RS), and R01 NS033310 (JE). The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this material are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official views or policies of the U.S. Government or the American Epilepsy Society.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

IRB of University of California Los Angeles gave ethical approval for this work. IRB of Thomas Jefferson University gave ethical approval for this work.

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Abbreviations AUC: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve CT: computerized tomography; CI: confidence interval; EEG: electroencephalogram; iEEG: intracranial electroencephalogram; EZ: epileptogenic zone; FR: fast ripple; fRonO: fast ripple on oscillation; fRonS: fast ripple on spike; GLMM: generalized linear mixed-effects model; HFO: high- frequency oscillation; ICA: independent component analysis; MI: mutual information; MEG: magnetoencephalography; MNI: Montreal Neurological Institute; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; NPV: negative predictive value; PC: principal component, PCA: principal component analysis; PPV,: positive predictive value; RNS: responsive neurostimulator; REM: rapid eye movement; ROC: receiver operating characteristic; RonO: ripples on oscillations; RonS: ripples on spikes; SUDEP: sudden unexplained death in epilepsy; SOZ: seizure onset zone; SVM: support vector machine; TJU: Thomas Jefferson University; UCLA: University of California Los Angeles.

Data Availability

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted January 21, 2022.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Graph Theoretical Measures of Fast Ripples Support the Epileptic Network Hypothesis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Graph Theoretical Measures of Fast Ripples Support the Epileptic Network Hypothesis
Shennan A Weiss, Tomas Pastore, Iren Orosz, Daniel Rubinstein, Richard Gorniak, Zachary Waldman, Itzhak Fried, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan, Diego Slezak, Gregory Worrell, Jerome Engel Jr, Michael R. Sperling, Richard J Staba
medRxiv 2022.01.20.22269492; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.22269492
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Graph Theoretical Measures of Fast Ripples Support the Epileptic Network Hypothesis
Shennan A Weiss, Tomas Pastore, Iren Orosz, Daniel Rubinstein, Richard Gorniak, Zachary Waldman, Itzhak Fried, Chengyuan Wu, Ashwini Sharan, Diego Slezak, Gregory Worrell, Jerome Engel Jr, Michael R. Sperling, Richard J Staba
medRxiv 2022.01.20.22269492; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.22269492

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Neurology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (179)
  • Allergy and Immunology (431)
  • Anesthesia (99)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (943)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (178)
  • Dermatology (109)
  • Emergency Medicine (260)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (420)
  • Epidemiology (8971)
  • Forensic Medicine (4)
  • Gastroenterology (418)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (1938)
  • Geriatric Medicine (190)
  • Health Economics (400)
  • Health Informatics (1323)
  • Health Policy (657)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (517)
  • Hematology (212)
  • HIV/AIDS (416)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (10772)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (571)
  • Medical Education (200)
  • Medical Ethics (54)
  • Nephrology (221)
  • Neurology (1819)
  • Nursing (108)
  • Nutrition (271)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (351)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (469)
  • Oncology (992)
  • Ophthalmology (296)
  • Orthopedics (111)
  • Otolaryngology (182)
  • Pain Medicine (126)
  • Palliative Medicine (44)
  • Pathology (265)
  • Pediatrics (576)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (275)
  • Primary Care Research (234)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (1892)
  • Public and Global Health (4111)
  • Radiology and Imaging (674)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (364)
  • Respiratory Medicine (548)
  • Rheumatology (224)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (190)
  • Sports Medicine (177)
  • Surgery (207)
  • Toxicology (38)
  • Transplantation (109)
  • Urology (80)