Abstract
Purpose To evaluate if an intraoperative OCT (iOCT) optimized surgical protocol without prolonged overpressure is non-inferior to a standard protocol during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).
Design A multicenter international prospective non-inferiority randomized control trial
Subjects Sixty-five pseudophakic eyes of 65 patients with corneal endothelial dysfunction resulting from Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy were enrolled in 3 corneal centers in The Netherlands and Belgium.
Methods The study was powered to include 63 patients scheduled for routine DMEK. Subjects were randomized to the control arm (n=33) without iOCT-use and raising the intraocular pressure above normal physiological limits for 8 minutes (i.e., overpressure) or the intervention arm (n=32) with OCT-guidance to assess graft orientation and adherence while refraining from prolonged raising the intraocular pressure. The RD and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated from a logistic regression model using 1,000 bootstrap samples. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of graft detachment, surgeon-reported iOCT-aided surgical decision making, surgical time, endothelial cell density (ECD), and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA).
Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative surgery-related adverse events, defined as rebubbling, graft failure, and iatrogenic acute glaucoma. The non-inferiority margin was set at a risk difference (RD) of 10%.
Results In the control group, 13 adverse events were recorded in 10 subjects compared to 13 adverse events in 12 subjects in the intervention group. The mean unadjusted RD measured 0.38% (95%CI: - 9.64–10.64) and the RD adjusted for study site measured -0.32% (95%CI: -10.29–9.84). No significant differences in ECD and CDVA were found between the two groups 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Surgeons reported that iOCT aided surgical decision-making in 40% of cases. Surgical- and graft unfolding time were, respectively, 13% and 27% shorter in the iOCT-group.
Conclusions iOCT-guided DMEK surgery with refraining from prolonged over-pressuring was non-inferior compared to conventional treatment. Surgery times were reduced considerably, and surgeons reported the iOCT aided surgical decision-making in 40% of cases. Refraining from prolonged overpressure did not affect postoperative ECD or CDVA.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03763721
Funding Statement
The research was financially supported by unrestricted grants provided by the Dr. F.P. Fischerstichting and Carl Zeiss Meditec.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Medical Ethics Committee Utrecht of University Medical Center Utrecht gave ethical approval for this work (file no. 18-487); Ethical committee Leuven of University hospital Leuven gave gave ethical approval for this work (file no. S61527
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Funding and conflict of interest statement The authors have no financial or proprietary interest in the materials presented herein. MBM is supported by research grants provided by the Dr. F.P. Fischerstichting and Carl Zeiss GmbH. RW is consultant for Zeiss GmbH.
Data Availability
All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors
