Abstract
Background Meta-analysis of international literature indicate high frequencies of aggression in mental health setting. Several studies indicate that among professional health workers, nurses are more likely than other staff members to experience aggressive incidences from patients. Furthermore, based on cause, nurses apply range of interventions in managing aggression, however, despite their perceived value of their intervention in managing aggression, no single intervention is sufficient for handling aggressive patients to stay in control in wards. Despite high priority placed on patient aggression management, insufficient research studies have been conducted on nurses’ perceptions regarding current skills in minimizing patient’s aggression.
Objectives The purpose of the study was to describe nurses’ perceptions regarding current assessment skills in minimizing patient’s aggression at selected Psychiatric hospital.
Methodology Non-experimental, exploratory, descriptive research design was used to guide research process. All-inclusive sampling method was used with 119 nurses as respondents. Data was collected by means of a questionnaire, analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive statistics procedure was used to present findings of the study.
Results Minority of respondents, (n=27) 22.7% agreed that their current assessment skills for minimizing patients’ aggression were good compared to majority of respondents, (n=92) 77.3%, who expressed a different opinion. This suggests that there is limited current assessment skills in identifying high risk aggressive patients in a selected Psychiatric hospital.
Conclusion The findings of study indicate that there is limited current assessment skills in minimizing patients’ aggression at selected Psychiatric hospital. Therefore, there is need to provide comprehensive information on nurses’ current skills in minimizing patients’ aggression to obtain richer information.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study did not receive any funding
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The Research Committee of the University of KwaZulu Natal gave ethical approval(ID-HSS/067/018M) Lesotho Ministry of Health Research and Ethics Committee gave ethical approval (ID-110/2018)
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Email Address: 4321bellah{at}gmail.com, (+266) 62017505
Email address: 202507610{at}ukzn.stu.co.za, Phone Number: (+27) 792198400
Data Availability
All data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript