Abstract
Introduction Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) and neuroimaging offer new opportunities for improving diagnosis and prognosis of dementia. To synthesise the available literature, we performed a systematic review.
Methods We systematically reviewed primary research publications up to January 2021, using AI for neuroimaging to predict diagnosis and/or prognosis in cognitive neurodegenerative diseases. After initial screening, data from each study was extracted, including: demographic information, AI methods, neuroimaging features, and results.
Results We found 2709 reports, with 252 eligible papers remaining following screening. Most studies relied on the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) dataset (n=178) with no other individual dataset used more than 5 times. Algorithmic classifiers, such as support vector machine (SVM), were the most commonly used AI method (47%) followed by discriminative (32%) and generative (11%) classifiers. Structural MRI was used in 71% of studies with a wide range of accuracies for the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases and predicting prognosis. Lower accuracy was found in studies using a multi-class classifier or an external cohort as the validation group. There was improvement in accuracy when neuroimaging modalities were combined, e.g. PET and structural MRI. Only 17 papers studied non-Alzheimer’s disease dementias.
Conclusion The use of AI with neuroimaging for diagnosis and prognosis in dementia is a rapidly emerging field. We make a number of recommendations addressing the definition of key clinical questions, heterogeneity of AI methods, and the availability of appropriate and representative data. We anticipate that addressing these issues will enable the field to move towards meaningful clinical translation.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This systematic review was supported by the Deep Dementia Phenotyping (DEMON) network (http://demondementia.com/). DEMON is an international network for the application of data science and AI to dementia research. It brings together academics, clinicians and other partners from across the world to identify innovative approaches to interdisciplinary collaborative dementia research across multiple institutions. All co-authors who contributed to this systematic review were members of the DEMON network. We organized monthly meetings between co-authors to prepare the review, share ideas, distribute tasks and write the manuscript. Jose Bernal is supported by the MRC Doctoral Training Programme in Precision Medicine (Award Reference No. 2096671). Amanpreet Badhwar is supported by Fonds de recherche du Quebec Sante, Chercheur boursiers Junior 1 and Fondation Courtois. Matthew Betts is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), Project ID 425899996, SFB 1436 Project A08 and by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, funding code 01ED2102B) under the aegis of JPND. Eugene Tang, NIHR Clinical Lecturer, is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, NHS or the UK Department of Health and Social Care Sofia Michopoulou, NIHR Clinical Lecturer, was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration ARC Wessex, the Southampton Academy of Research and the Health Education England Topol Fellowship program. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author and not necessarily those of the funding bodies. Carlos Munoz-Neira was supported by the Government of Chile through 'Becas Chile' and CONICYT - National Commission for Scientific and Technological Research [CONICYT - Comision Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica y Tecnologica], the University of Bristol (Grant Code G100030 150), and its Postdoctoral Research Associate position at the University of Sheffield.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript and supplementary material.
