Abstract
Objective Determining whether individual patients differ in response to treatment (‘treatment effect heterogeneity’) is important as it is a prerequisite to developing personalised treatment approaches. Previous variability meta-analyses of response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia found no evidence for treatment effect heterogeneity. Conversely, individual patient data meta-analyses suggest treatment effect heterogeneity does exist. In the current paper we combine individual patient data with study level data to resolve this apparent contradiction and quantitively characterise antipsychotic treatment effect heterogeneity in schizophrenia.
Method Individual patient data (IPD) was obtained from the Yale University Open Data Access (YODA) project. Clinical trials were identified in EMBASE, PsycInfo, and PubMed. Treatment effect heterogeneity was estimated from variability ratios derived from study-level data from 66 RCTs of antipsychotics in schizophrenia (N=17,202). This estimation required a correlation coefficient (ρ) between placebo response and treatment effects to be estimated. We estimated this from both study level estimates of the 66 trials, and individual patient data (N=560).
Results Both individual patient (ρ=-0.32, p=0.002) and study level (ρ=-0.38, p<0.001) analyses yielded a negative correlation between placebo response and treatment effect. Using these estimates we found evidence of clinically significant treatment effect heterogeneity for total symptoms (our most conservative estimate was SD = 13.5 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) points). Mean treatment effects were 8.6 points which, given the estimated SD, suggests the top quartile of patients experienced beneficial treatment effects of at least 17.7 PANSS points, while the bottom quartile received no benefit as compared to placebo.
Conclusions We found evidence of clinically meaningful treatment effect heterogeneity for antipsychotic treatment of schizophrenia. This suggests efforts to personalise treatment have potential for success, and demonstrates that variability meta-analyses of RCTs need to account for relationships between placebo response and treatment effects.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr McCutcheon has received honoraria for educational talks from Otsuka. Dr Pillinger has participated in speaker meetings organised by Lundbeck, Otsuka, Sunovion, Schwabe Pharma and Recordati. Dr. Mulsant receives research support from Capital Solution Design LLC (software used in a study founded by CAMH Foundation), and HAPPYneuron (software used in a study founded by Brain Canada). Within the past five years, he has also received research support from Eli Lilly (medications for a NIH-funded clinical trial) and Pfizer (medications for a NIH-funded clinical trial). He has been an unpaid consultant to Myriad Neuroscience Professor Cipriani has received research and consultancy fees from INCiPiT (Italian Network for Paediatric Trials), CARIPLO Foundation and Angelini Pharma, outside the submitted work. Professor Howes is a part-time employee of H Lundbeck A/s and has received investigator-initiated research funding from and/or participated in advisory/ speaker meetings organised by Angellini, Autifony, Biogen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Heptares, Global Medical Education, Invicro, Jansenn, Lundbeck, Neurocrine, Otsuka, Sunovion, Rand, Recordati, Roche and Viatris/Mylan. Neither Professor Howes nor his family have holdings or a financial stake in any pharmaceutical company. Professor Howes has a patent for the use of dopaminergic imaging.
Funding Statement
Dr McCutcheon is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Dr Pillinger is supported by the NIHR and Maudsley Charity. Dr. Efthimiou was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Ambizione grant number 180083). Dr. Mulsant holds and receives support from the Labatt Family Chair in Biology of Depression in Late-Life Adults at the University of Toronto. He also receives support from several grants from the US National Institute of Mental Health and the US Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Professor Cipriani is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Cognitive Health Clinical Research Facility, by an NIHR Research Professorship (grant RP-2017-08-ST2-006), by the NIHR Oxford and Thames Valley Applied Research Collaboration and by the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (grant BRC-1215-20005). Professor Howes is supported by the Medical Research Council-UK (grant no. MC_A656_5QD30_2135), Maudsley Charity (grant no. 666), and Wellcome Trust (grant no. 094849/Z/10/Z) and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of H Lundbeck A/s, the NHS/NIHR or the Department of Health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study data is publicly available via pubmed, the individual patient data is available from https://yoda.yale.edu/ on application. All studies from either of these databases received ethical approval, access to the YODA database was granted after review of an application form by the YODA committee.
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ and https://yoda.yale.edu/