Abstract
Purpose With increasing breast cancer (BC) survival rates, the survivors’ quality of life (QoL) has become an important issue. Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment, known as “chemobrain” has been addressed recently. Therefore, cognitive function as one of the determinants of QoL should be considered while prescribing chemotherapeutics. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of two common chemotherapy regimens on BC survivors’ cognition.
Methods The participants comprised 35 BC patients who underwent two common chemotherapy regimens, AC-T and TAC, and 24 matched healthy volunteers. The participants were assessed regarding anxiety, depression, general health status, and cognitive function including aspects of concentration, verbal ability, reasoning, memory, and visuospatial skill through Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-P) and Cambridge Brain Science (CBS) tests.
Results Regarding depression and anxiety, there were no significant differences between the three groups. However, BC patients significantly complained of chronic fatigue compared to healthy volunteers (P-value = 0.027). Besides, ACE-P revealed the language domain to be affected in the AC-T group in comparison with the TAC-treated cases (P-value = 0.036). Moreover, the patients receiving the AC-T regimen had worse performance in visuospatial working memory and attention domains compared to the TAC group considering CBS tests (P-value = 0.031 and 0.008, respectively).
Conclusion The results represent the AC-T regimen to be more toxic than the TAC in domains of language, concentration, and visuospatial working memory.
Implications for cancer survivors The AC-T regimen should be prescribed with caution in BC patients suffering from baseline cognitive impairments to improve post-chemotherapy QoL.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
Partial financial support was received from the School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (ID: 15307)
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
