Abstract
Alterations of the gut microbiota, often referred to as gut dysbiosis, have been associated with several chronic diseases and longevity in pre-clinical models as well as in observational studies. Whether these relationships underlie causal associations in humans remains to be established. We aimed to determine whether gut dysbiosis influences the risk of chronic diseases and longevity using a comprehensive 2-Sample Mendelian randomization (2SMR) approach. We included as exposures inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) as a human model of gut dysbiosis, 11 gut-associated metabolites and pathways and 48 microbial taxa. Study outcomes included eight chronic diseases previously linked with gut dysbiosis using observational studies (Alzheimer’s disease, depression, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, osteoporosis and chronic kidney disease) as well as parental longevity and life expectancy. Neither IBD, nor gut-associated metabolites were causally associated with chronic disease or lifespan. After multiple testing correction for 582 tests, no microbial taxa-chronic disease associations remained significant. After robustness analyses and multivariate MR to correct for body mass index and alcohol intake on all 42 nominally significant causal relationships, four associations remained. Altogether, results of this multidimensional Mendelian randomization study suggest that gut dysbiosis has little impact on chronic diseases and human longevity and that previous documented associations may not underly causal relationships. Studies with larger sample sizes and more optimal taxonomic discrimination may ultimately be required to determine whether the human gut microbiota plays a causal role in the etiology of chronic diseases and longevity.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
EG holds a masters research award from the Fonds de recherche du Quebec: Sante. (FRQS). BJA and ST hold junior scholar awards from the FRQS. Part of this study was supported by the European Union through the European Regional Development fund. The work of Estonian Genome Center, Univ. of Tartu has been supported by the European Regional Development Fund and grants No. GENTRANSMED (2014-2020.4.01.15-0012), MOBERA5 (Norface Network project no 462.16.107) and 2014-2020.4.01.16-0125. This study was also funded by the European Union through Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant no 810645 and through the European Regional Development Fund project no. MOBEC008 and Estonian Research Council Grant PUT1660.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
All GWAS summary statistics that were used we in the public domain with the exception of the NAFLD GWAS meta-analysis that is based on two new analysis from the UK Biobank and the Estonian Biobank. The UK Biobank was performed using data application number 25205. UK Biobank has approval from the North West Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee. This analysis of the Estonian Biobank was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the University of Tartu (approval number 288/M-18). For the other publicly available GWAS summary statistics, all participants provided informed consent and study protocols were approved by their respective local ethical committee. This project was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data used in this study are in the public domain. Supplementary tables 4 and 5 describe the data used and relevant information to retrieve the summary statistics.