Synopsis
Objective Objective measurement of antiretrovirals may aid clinical interventions for improving adherence to HIV prevention or treatment regimens. A point-of-care urine test could provide real-time information about recent adherence to regimens containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF). We developed a lateral flow immunoassay (LFA) and enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for urinary tenofovir.
Methods Intensity of the LFA test line was quantified using an optical reader and visually scored 0 – 5 by two independent people, using a reference card. The sensitivity and specificity of both the ELISA and LFA were determined for two different tenofovir concentration cutoffs for TDF and TAF adherence—1,500 ng/mL and 150 ng/mL, respectively. To validate the assays, we measured 586 urine samples from 28 individuals collected as part of a study of tenofovir pharmacokinetics in adults, which were also measured by mass spectrometry as ground truth.
Results Both the LFA signal and ELISA signal were each strongly correlated to drug concentrations (0.91 and 0.92 respectively). The LFA signal and ELISA were highly sensitive and specific at both thresholds (LFA se/sp TDF 89%/96%, TAF 90%/96%; ELISA se/sp TDF 94%/94%, TAF 92%/84%). Visual scoring of the LFA was also highly sensitive and specific at both the TDF and TAF thresholds (se/sp TDF 91%/94%, TAF 87%/90%).
Conclusions Our rapid semi-quantitative test can measure TFV concentrations relevant to both TAF or TDF adherence, which may support adherence-promoting interventions across a range of HIV care settings.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health NIAID R01AI13664.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The testing of anonymized patient samples for this research was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Massachusetts General Hospital.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Some elements of this work have been presented publicly at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (virtual, March 6-10, 2021) and the Consortium of Universities for Global Health (virtual, March 12-14, 2021).
Data Availability
The datasets used and generated in this study are administrated by the corresponding author and may be made freely available by reasonable request.
