Mixed invasive molds among COVID-19 patients

INTRODUCTION

Over the past one and half years, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has presented with a myriad of manifestations and complications [1,2]. Whilst the world managed to recover from the first wave of COVID-19, the second wave has put the world at wits end, with the SARS-CoV-2 virus bringing up new surprises and tricks. The second wave has especially hit hard on India, especially the recent increased incidence of invasive fungal infections.

The usually rare acute invasive fungal rhinosinusitis cases have surged in post-COVID patients [3-5]. Since there is a lack of population-based studies in the literature to estimate the baseline incidence prevalence rate of mucormycosis in India, it is difficult to state that the overall incidence rate of COVID-associated mucormycosis (CAM) has increased [6]. COVID-associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) is another entity that came into the picture during the first wave of the COVID pandemic [7]. But mixed/dual invasive fungal infections associated with COVID-19 have rarely been reported.

To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case series of ten consecutive cases of COVID-associated mucor-aspergillosis (CAMA) with their associated risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.

METHODS

RESULTS

The main demographic, clinical characteristics, and associated risk factors for fungal infections of the ten patients at the time of hospital admission were described (Table 1). Only six were confirmed COVID positive before admission. The remaining four cases were never tested for COVID before admission despite having clinical symptoms suggestive of the same and were diagnosed with COVID by RT-PCR after admission. The major events of the course of illness for each case were presented (Figure 1). There were six men and four women with a mean age of 49.2 ± 8.8 years, with a minimum age of 34 and maximum age of 62 years. All patients had history of COVID within one month (15-23 days) of presentation (Figure 1, Table 1) and were diabetics. Eight had uncontrolled diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control (HbA1C >7.0), one was pre-diabetic, and one had long-duration diabetes (>7 years) with glycaemic control (Table 1). Six patients were previously hospitalized with COVID-associated respiratory distress, and one had received home-based oxygen therapy due to the unavailability of hospital beds at his home place. These seven patients also had documented history of steroid intake for an average of one week.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab

Figure 1:

Schematic timeline presentation from day of symptom onset to outcome for 10 COVID-19 associated mucor-aspergillosis patients.

Patient 1 was diagnosed as a case of diabetic ketoacidosis with severe COVID-associated pneumonia and sepsis. On day-5 and day-9, two consecutive nasal tissue samples were sent to the laboratory for KOH mount that showed acute angle branched thin hyaline septate hyphae, suggestive of Aspergillus spp. and was started on injection amphotericin-B. The patient’s condition worsened, on day-14 repeat nasal tissue KOH revealed both broad aseptate perpendicular branching hyphae and thin hyaline septate hyphae. But the patient succumbed a day later.

Pre-operative nasal tissue KOH stain of Patient 2 was suggestive of Mucorales and Aspergillus whereas only broad aseptate hyphae were visible in the post-operative sample, but the fungal culture of both samples showed growth of R. arrhizus and A. flavus.

Patients 4 and 10 were intubated and managed conservatively by medical management only. Patients 3,7,8, and 9 were diagnosed on the same day of their admission and were managed with medical therapy aided by endoscopic debridement. On follow-up, these patients are recovering well to date.

Radiological, microbiological, and histopathological (HPE) diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of the patients were described (Table 2). Nasal tissue of all patients showed growth of R. arrhizus with A. flavus in seven and A. fumigatus in three patients. Other laboratory markers were described in supplementary table 1. Only 70% of patients (7/10) were managed successfully in terms of saving a life.

DISCUSSION

During the first wave of COVID, the primary focus was on COVID–associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA), other fungal superinfections, including Candida infections and rare mold infections, whereas the second wave of COVID pandemic, especially in India, has observed an exponential increase of cases of COVID–associated mucormycosis (CAM) [6,11-13]. Rapid diagnosis of secondary infections and co-infections is complex and crucial for early management. Mucormycosis is a life-threatening entity however, the true impact of Aspergillus co-infections remains unknown. There is a paucity of data regarding mixed mucormycosis and aspergillosis co-infection in the available literature with no such data available in COVID patients i.e. CAMA.

Mucorales and Aspergillus are ubiquitous soil-dwelling organisms, and humans are exposed daily to fungal elements. They dwell in decaying organic matter, soil, animal excreta, dust, compost, foods, spices, unfiltered air, and ventilation system. Aspergillus spp. is one of the most commonly isolated fungus among healthy volunteers and forms part of their mycobiota [14].

The most important risk factors for mucormycosis and aspergillosis include uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, and use of corticosteroids leading to hyperglycemia, extensive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, prolonged hospitalization, and presence of co-morbidities such as structural lung defects, with diabetes being most common risk factor for mucormycosis [15]. Apart from aforementioned risk factors, cytokine storm activated by the viral antigens, high airway pressure, and hypoxia-induced acute lung injury secondary to mechanical ventilation along woth drug toxicity increases risk of invasive aspergillosis. Moreover, in ideal situations, immunocompromised patients should be kept in isolation rooms with positive pressure but to protect healthcare workers from COVID, it was recommended to keep COVID positive patients in negative pressure rooms. Ichai et al. also demonstrated that patients admitted in negative pressure ICU rooms were at higher risk of aspergillosis and other secondary infections as well [16]. Patient’s co-morbidities further influence the likelihood of secondary fungal infections [17]. In this study, patients 1, 6, and 7 had a history of cigarette smoking which is strongly associated with adverse outcomes from COVID in studies [18].

In this study, all patients suffered from COVID-associated pneumonitis either at admission or within the past one month suggesting that residual pathology from an initial infection by respiratory viral infections can directly damage airway epithelium and facilitate invasion of tissues by molds like Mucorales and Aspergillus spp [19]. SARS CoV-2 leads to immune dysfunction or dysregulation, leading to a decreased T-cell population, mostly affecting the CD4+ CD8+ T-cell subset and induces lymphocytopenia, thus giving way to bacterial and fungal superinfection [9,20]. In the case of hematological malignancies, severe lymphopenia has earlier been established as a predicting risk factor for invasive mold disease as was also observed in patient 10 in this study who had pancytopenia [21].

Although the triad of COVID pneumonia, diabetes, and steroid use is common for patients worldwide, yet secondary fungal infections have been exponentially reported from India. Few possible reasons for this may be environmental factors, widespread use of steroids, monoclonal antibodies, broad-spectrum antibiotics, antiparasitics, antivirals as part of cocktail therapy used against COVID even in mild cases with no strict prescription checks in India and most drugs including glucocorticoids readily available over the counter. The pre-COVID baseline prevalence of mucormycosis (14 cases/100,000 people) in India is much higher than in the rest of the world (0.2/100,000) [4]. In a multicentric study done in Indian ICUs, Aspergillus species were the commonest (82.1%) mold isolated [22]. What’s more, India is the diabetes capital of the world, having the second-largest population with diabetes globally and SARS CoV-2 virus has been found to be more prevalent and severe in people with diabetes [23, 24]. Hyperglycaemia incites hypervirulence of specific pathogens and is also an independent risk factor for bacterial and fungal co-infections [25].

Irrational use of steroids either for a long duration or during the early phase of COVID illness or in higher than recommended doses has been cited as one of the most common underlying causes for fungal superinfection in COVID patients [4].

Environmental factors play a significant role in increasing CAM and CAPA in the Indian subcontinent. The atmosphere is more conducive for the fungus to thrive in South Asian developing countries [26]. There are a few unanswered and unresolved theories like incessant use of industrial-grade oxygen and use of herbal products may have caused this increase in fungal diseases. There could also be a possible role of contaminated water used in humidifiers, unsterile humidifier bottles, and non-medical grade industrial oxygen cylinders in an increase of fungal infections through the spread of fungal spores [27]. Though fungal spores do not survive in water yet chances of transmission of spores may be there from high contact hospital surfaces including reusable humidifier bottles. Considering abovementioned viewpoints, the present study patients also had such exposures, but a direct relationship couldn’t be established.

Patient 5 in this study had a history of incision and drainage for dental extraction at a local clinic suggesting her case likely to be healthcare-associated. Few patients in this study also had a history of previous hospitalization, which may have exposed patients to fungal infections. Studies have reported such secondary fungal infections due to adhesive bandages, wooden tongue depressors, negative pressure rooms, poor air filtration, non-sterile medical devices water leaks, and building construction [28].

Diagnosis of fungal infections is often challenging due to their ubiquitous nature. Direct microscopy (10% KOH mount) and fungal cultures, although have low sensitivity (<50%), remain essential tools. Positive culture growth may often reflect laboratory contamination or colonization of nasal tissue and upper respiratory samples, rather than the true disease. HPE, though, may confirm invasiveness but is time-taking. Further studies must target to identify biomarkers indicating tissue invasion stages and airway involvement. Off lately, new molecular platforms are being investigated. Mucorales PCR in combination with screening assays for Aspergillus like serum galactomannan (GM) and (1→3)-β-d-glucan (BG) antigen assays are useful and should be implemented in high-risk cases [29]. Clinical and radiological findings need to be correlated with culture findings [8]. Culture sensitivity has little value in dual infections except identifying non-amphotericin antifungal identification if any to reduce amphotericin-B resistance in the future since after this drug no other broad-spectrum exists at present.

Based on this study findings, herein we propose case definitions for CAMA (Table 3). Since, the included cases had mixed infection,they were presumed to be proven if both fungal type were of proven type. However, in reality patients may have proven mucor with probable or possible aspergillosis or any combinations. Then what to do?

This study has its own limitations with lack of serum GM test which could have helped identifying the cases as of proven invasive aspergillosis. In the study, despite an early diagnosis of fungal infection post-admission, most participants could not be started on antifungal immediately with an average gap of 4-5 days in diagnosis and start of antifungal due to limited supply of amphotericin-B (Figure 1). Similar observations were made in a multicentric study conducted in other parts of India [30]. A delay of a week in diagnosis may double the 30-day mortality from 35% to 66% [3]. Treating CAMA is more worrisome since one (aspergillosis is a metastatic invasive infection) focuses majorly on medical treatment while the other focuses equally on surgical and medical management (mucor is a locally invasive infection). Patient 1 was diagnosed about 10 days after admission and couldn’t be saved, reflecting on the need for timely diagnosis and treatment.

In conclusion, mixed fungal infections i.e. CAMA as COVID sequelae may be an emerging disease. This outbreak was seen particularly in COVID (or post-) patients with uncontrolled diabetes, on steroids, or cocktail therapy, or living in unhygienic environments. So judicious and relevant use of various medicines (drug stewardship) along with strict maintenance of personal and environmental hygiene is the key to prevent CAMA in COVID era. Patients should be advised to keep a check on their glycaemic index and seek medical advice at the earliest. Despite the increased risk of fatality due to CAMA, active multidisciplinary teamwork may help reducing mortality by diagnosing and managing timely. The focus should be on empirical management: hit hard approach with both medical and surgical treatment. The study’s findings suggest that timely and accurate diagnosis of CAMA is a must for effective disease management and thus improve outcomes. CAMA may often remain unreported. Identification of risk factors for CAMA and measures to prevent the same may help manage invasive fungal infections in COVID patients, thus decreasing overall morbidity. Lastly, the criteria to classify into proven, possible, and probable types of IFD among CAMA patients need a change.

Contributors

VS, AP, and PKP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Original draft preparation. MT, AT, and AT: Visualization, Investigation. PKP, AKS and SR: Supervision, critically reviewing. AT and MB: Reviewing and Editing, Validation. All authors approved the drafting.

Data sharing

It will be made available to others as required upon requesting the corresponding author.

Declarations

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. This case series is part of a project titled disease profile of COVID-l9 (DPC-I9), including their follow-up in patients at a tertiary institute in India, approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh.