Abstract
Background The incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) has increased over the past two decades and is considered an urgent threat by the Centers for Disease Control. Hypervirulent strains such as ribotype 027, that possess genes for an additional toxin C. difficile binary toxin (CDT) are contributing to increased morbidity and mortality. In the mouse model, CDT activates Toll-like receptor 2 resulting in suppression of a protective type 2 innate immune response mediated by eosinophils.
Methods We retrospectively tested stool from 215 CDI patients for CDT by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Stratifying patients by CDT status, we assessed if disease severity and clinical outcomes correlated with CDT positivity. Additionally, we performed 16 S rRNA gene sequencing to examine if CDT positive samples had an altered fecal microbiota.
Results We found that patients with CdtB, the pore forming component of CDT, detected in their stool were more likely to have severe disease and had higher 90-day mortality compared to CDT negative patients. CDT positive patients also had higher C. difficile bacterial burden and white blood cell counts. There was no significant difference in gut microbiome diversity between CDT positive and negative patients.
Conclusions Patients with fecal samples that were positive for CDT had increased disease severity and worse clinical outcomes. Utilization of PCR and C. difficile Toxins A and B testing may not reveal the entire picture when diagnosing CDI and the detection of CDT-expressing strains may be valuable during patient treatment.
Summary We found that CDI patients with CDT detected in stool by immunoassay were more likely to have severe disease and had higher 90-day mortality.
Competing Interest Statement
W.A.P. is a consultant for TechLab Inc and R.J.C and M.W.L. are TechLab Inc employees. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by National Institutes of Health (R01 AI124214-05 to W.A.P., K23AI163368 to G.R.M., F32DK124048 to J.L.L.) and National Center for Advancing Translational Science (UL1TR003015, KL2TR003016).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
UVA IRB-HSR 16926
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
We will submit all corresponding data and code to Dryad or NPG hub upon the acceptance of our submission.