ABSTRACT
Objectives We completed a registered double-blind randomized control trial to compare acclimatization to two hearing aid algorithms by experienced pediatric hearing aid users with mild to moderate hearing loss. We hypothesized that extended use (up to 13 months) of the adaptive algorithm with integrated directionality and noise reduction, OpenSound Navigator (OSN), would result in improved performance compared to the control algorithm, omnidirectional (Omni), on auditory, cognitive and academic tasks.
Design We recruited 42 children, aged 6 - 13 years old, through Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center’s Division of Audiology. Two children withdrew from the study due to noncompliance or discomfort. The remaining 40 children were paired by age (within one year) and hearing loss (level and configuration). The individuals from each pair were randomly assigned to a group: OSN (experimental) and Omni (control). Each child completed an audiology evaluation, hearing aid fitting, a follow up audiological appointment and two research visits up to 13 months apart. Research visit outcome measures covered speech perception (in quiet and in noise), novel grammar and word learning, cognition, academic ability and caregiver report of listening behaviours.
Results The children with the experimental algorithm did not show improved performance on the outcome measures compared to the control algorithm. There was a significant relationship between age at first hearing aid use and Reading and Mathematical ability across all participants. Data from six children were not included in the analysis due to daily hearing aid usage of less than 6 hours.
Conclusions Use of the experimental algorithm (OSN) neither enhanced nor reduced performance on auditory, cognitive and academic tasks compared to the control algorithm (Omni).
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
NCT03771287
Funding Statement
This research study was supported by a grant from the Oticon Foundation that was awarded to the Communication Sciences Research Center at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. David R. Moore is partly supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center IRB
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest and Source of Funding: None declared. This research study was supported by a grant from the Oticon Foundation that was awarded to the Communication Sciences Research Center at Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center. David R. Moore is partly supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre.
Preregistration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03771287
Data sharing: Deidentified behavioural and audiological data and dictionaries can be downloaded indefinitely from https://osf.io/d72n8/. We certify that this repository includes sufficient information to reproduce the reported results.
Material sharing: Tasks, stimuli, data extraction and analysis scripts can be downloaded indefinitely from https://github.com/stewarthannahj/OtiS.git. We certify that this repository includes sufficient information to reproduce the methodology.
