Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Minimizing the infected peak utilizing a single lockdown: a technical result regarding equal peaks

View ORCID ProfileJames M. Greene, View ORCID ProfileEduardo D. Sontag
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.21259589
James M. Greene
1Department of Mathematics, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, United States
2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James M. Greene
  • For correspondence: jgreene@clarkson.edu
Eduardo D. Sontag
2Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Department of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, United States
3Laboratory of Systems Pharmacology, Program in Therapeutic Science, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Eduardo D. Sontag
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Due to the usage of social distancing as a means to control the spread of the novel coronavirus disease COVID-19, there has been a large amount of research into the dynamics of epidemiological models with time-varying transmission rates. Such studies attempt to capture population responses to differing levels of social distancing, and are used for designing policies which both inhibit disease spread but also allow for limited economic activity. One common criterion utilized for the recent pandemic is the peak of the infected population, a measure of the strain placed upon the health care system; protocols which reduce this peak are commonly said to ‘flatten the curve.” In this work, we consider a very specialized distancing mandate, which consists of one period of fixed length of distancing, and addresses the question of optimal initiation time. We prove rigorously that this time is characterized by an equal peaks phenomenon: the optimal protocol will experience a rebound in the infected peak after distancing is relaxed, which is equal in size to the peak when distancing is commenced. In the case of a non-perfect lockdown (i.e. disease transmission is not completely suppressed), explicit formulas for the initiation time cannot be computed, but implicit relations are provided which can be pre-computed given the current state of the epidemic. Expected extensions to more general distancing policies are also hypothesized, which suggest designs for the optimal timing of non-overlapping lockdowns.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

N/A

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

N/A

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

N/A

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted June 30, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Minimizing the infected peak utilizing a single lockdown: a technical result regarding equal peaks
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Minimizing the infected peak utilizing a single lockdown: a technical result regarding equal peaks
James M. Greene, Eduardo D. Sontag
medRxiv 2021.06.26.21259589; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.21259589
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Minimizing the infected peak utilizing a single lockdown: a technical result regarding equal peaks
James M. Greene, Eduardo D. Sontag
medRxiv 2021.06.26.21259589; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.26.21259589

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Epidemiology
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (215)
  • Allergy and Immunology (495)
  • Anesthesia (106)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (1095)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (196)
  • Dermatology (141)
  • Emergency Medicine (274)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (500)
  • Epidemiology (9765)
  • Forensic Medicine (5)
  • Gastroenterology (480)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (2308)
  • Geriatric Medicine (222)
  • Health Economics (462)
  • Health Informatics (1557)
  • Health Policy (734)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (603)
  • Hematology (236)
  • HIV/AIDS (503)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (11638)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (617)
  • Medical Education (237)
  • Medical Ethics (67)
  • Nephrology (257)
  • Neurology (2141)
  • Nursing (134)
  • Nutrition (336)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (426)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (517)
  • Oncology (1175)
  • Ophthalmology (364)
  • Orthopedics (128)
  • Otolaryngology (220)
  • Pain Medicine (146)
  • Palliative Medicine (50)
  • Pathology (311)
  • Pediatrics (695)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (300)
  • Primary Care Research (266)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (2180)
  • Public and Global Health (4653)
  • Radiology and Imaging (776)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (457)
  • Respiratory Medicine (623)
  • Rheumatology (274)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (225)
  • Sports Medicine (210)
  • Surgery (251)
  • Toxicology (43)
  • Transplantation (120)
  • Urology (94)