Abstract
Background Patients with Primary Antibody Deficiencies (PAD) represent a potential at-risk group in the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, unexpectedly low cumulative incidence, low infection-fatality rate, and mild COVID-19 or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were frequently reported in PAD. The discrepancy between clinical evidence and impaired antibody production requires in-depth studies on patients’ immune responses.
Methods Forty-one patients with Common Variable Immune Deficiencies (CVID), 6 patients with X-linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA), and 28 healthy age-matched controls (HD) were analyzed for anti-Spike and anti-RBD antibody production, generation of low and high affinity Spike-specific memory B-cells, Spike-specific T-cells before and one week after the second dose of BNT162b2 vaccine.
Results HD produced antibodies, and generated memory B-cells with high affinity for Trimeric Spike. In CVID, the vaccine induced poor Spike-specific antibodies, and atypical B-cells with low affinity for Trimeric Spike, possibly by extra-follicular reactions or incomplete germinal center reactions. In HD, among Spike positive memory B-cells, we identified receptor-binding-domain-specific cells that were undetectable in CVID, indicating the incapability to generate this new specificity. Specific T-cell responses toward Spike-protein were evident in HD and defective in CVID. Due to the absence of B-cells, patients with XLA responded to immunization by specific T-cell responses only.
Conclusions We present detailed data on early non-canonical immune responses in PAD to a vaccine against an antigen never encountered before by humans. From our data, we expect that after BNT162b2 immunization, XLA patients might be protected by specific T-cells, while CVID patients might not be protected by immunization.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was founded by: Italian Ministry of Health RF2013-02358960 grant Italian Ministry of Health COVID-2020-12371817 grant
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was approved the Ethical Committee of the Sapienza University of Rome (Prot. 0521/2020, July 13, 2020). The study was performed in accordance with the Good Clinical Practice guidelines, the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines, and the most recent version of the Declaration of Helsinki.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data are available in the main text or the supplementary materials.