ABSTRACT
Background The capacity of the general internal medicine clinical teaching units has been strained by decreasing resident supply and increasing patient demand. The objective of our study was to quantitatively compare the number of residents (supply) with the volume and duration of patient care activities (demand) to identify inefficiency.
Methods Using the most recently available data from an academic teaching hospital, we identified each occurrence of a set of patient care activities that took place on the clinical teaching unit. We completed a descriptive analysis of the frequencies of these activities and how the frequencies varied by hour, day, week, month, and year. Patient care activities included admissions, rounds, responding to pages, meeting with patients and their families, patient transfers, discharges, and responding to cardiac arrests. The estimated time to complete each task was based on the available data in our electronic healthcare system and interviews with general internal medicine physicians or trainees. To calculate resident utilization, the person-hours of patient care tasks was divided by the person-hours of resident supply. Resident utilization was computed for three scenarios corresponding to varying levels of resident absenteeism.
Results Between 2015 and 2019 there were 14,581 consultations to general internal medicine from the emergency department. Patient volumes tended to be highest during January and lowest during May and June; and highest on Monday morning and lowest on Friday night. Daily admissions into hospital from the emergency department were higher on weekdays than on weekends, and hourly admissions peaked at 8:00 AM and between 3:00 PM and 1:00 AM. Weekday resident utilization was generally highest between 8:00 AM and 2:00 PM and lowest between 1:00 AM and 8:00 AM. In a scenario where all residents were present apart from those who were post-call, resident utilization generally never exceeded 100%; in scenarios where at least one resident was absent due to illness and/or vacation, it was common for resident utilization to approach or exceed 100%, particularly during daytime working hours.
Interpretation Analyzing supply and demand on a general internal medicine ward has allowed us to identify periods where supply and demand are not aligned and to empirically demonstrate the vulnerability of current staffing models. These data have the potential to inform and optimize scheduling on an internal medicine ward.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was funded by the Li Ka Shing Foundation.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
This study was approved by the St. Michael's Hospital Research Ethics Board.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Study concept and design: All authors
Analysis/interpretation of data: All authors
Drafting of the manuscript: Fralick M
Critical revision of the manuscript: All authors
Statistical analysis: Kaw N, Wang M
Obtained funding: This study was funded by the Li Ka Shing Foundation.
Conflicts of interest: Dr. Fralick reports no relevant conflicts of interest.
Data sharing statement: Data from this study are not available.
Data Availability
Data from this study are not available.