Abstract
Objective to identify contextual and mechanistic factors associated with outcomes of school-based obesity prevention interventions which may be implementable in UK primary schools.
Design realist synthesis following REMESES guidance. We developed an initial programme theory through expert consensus and stakeholder input and refined it with data from included studies to produce a final programme theory including all context-mechanism-outcome configurations.
Setting primary schools
Participants children aged 4-12
Interventions included in the 2019 Cochrane review on prevention of childhood obesity
Outcomes BMIz
Results We included 24 studies comprised of 71 documents in our synthesis. We found that contextual factors such as baseline BMIz affects intervention mechanisms variably, while girls, older children and those with higher parental education consistently benefitted more from school-based interventions. Key mechanisms associated with beneficial effect were sufficient intervention dose, environmental modification, and the intervention components working together as a whole. Education alone did not produce favourable outcomes.
Conclusions Interventions should go beyond education and incorporate a sufficient dose to trigger change in BMIz. Contextual factors deserve consideration when commissioning interventions to avoid widening health inequalities.
Competing Interest Statement
Dr. Jago reports grants from National Institute of Health Research during the conduct of the study. Other authors have no conflicts of interests to report.
Clinical Trial
PROSPERO Registration CRD42019142192
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West). The views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Not applicable. Secondary analysis of published data
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are already available in the public domain.
