Abstract
Background There is growing evidence that the early months of the COVID19 pandemic saw substantial declines in pediatric Emergency Department (ED) utilization in the U.S. However, less is known about whether utilization changed differentially for children who are socio-economically disadvantaged. We examined how changes pediatric ED visits during the early months of the COVID19 pandemic differed by two markers of socio-economic disadvantage, minoritized race and being publicly insured.
Methods This retrospective observational study used electronic medical records from a large pediatric ED in a Deep South state for January-June 2020. Three time-periods ╌ pre-COVID19 (TP0), COVID19 with restrictions like stay-at-home (TP1), and COVID19 with restrictions relaxed (TP2) in 2020 were compared with the corresponding time-periods in 2019. Changes in overall visits, visits for minoritized race (MR) versus non-Hispanic white (NHW) children, and Medicaid-enrolled versus privately-insured children were considered, and changes in acuity-mix of ED visits and share of visits resulting in inpatient admits were inspected.
Results Compared to 2019, total ED visits declined in TP1 and TP2 of 2020 (54.3%, 48.9%). Declines were larger for MR children (57.3%, 57.8%) compared to NHW children (50.5%, 39.3%), and Medicaid enrollees (56.5%, 52.0%) compared to the privately insured (48.3%, 39.0%). Particularly, MR children saw steeper percentage declines in high-acuity visits and visits resulting in inpatient admissions compared to NHW children. The mix of pediatric patients by race and insurance-status, as well as the share of high-acuity visits and visits with inpatient admissions differed between TP1 and TP2 of 2019 and 2020 (p<0.05 for all cases). In contrast, there was little evidence of difference between TP0 of 2019 and 2020.
Conclusion The role of socioeconomic disadvantage and the potential impacts on pediatric ED visits during COVID19 in the Deep South of the United States changes is understudied. We find evidence of steeper declines in visits among MR and Medicaid-enrolled children, including for high-acuity conditions, than their NHW and privately-insured counterparts. Since disadvantaged children sometimes lack access to a usual source of care, this raises concerns about unmet health needs, and worsening health disparities, in a region that already has poor health indicators.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding. Support was received through an internal funding mechanism at the UAB School of Public health.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study was reviewed and approved by IRB of University of Alabama at Birmingham
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
The patient data used in the paper includes PHI. We are happy to share our statistical program files and detailed descriptive statistics. However, accessing the raw data will require permission from appropriate institutions.