Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives

Gill Thomson, Marie-Clare Balaam, Rebecca Nowland, Nicola Crossland, Gill Moncrieff, Stephanie Heys, Arni Sarian, Joanne Cull, Soo Downe, ASPIRE-COVID19 Collaborative Group
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21254762
Gill Thomson
1School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. PR1 2HE
Roles: Professor in Perinatal Health
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: GThomson{at}uclan.ac.uk
Marie-Clare Balaam
2School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Nowland
3School of Nursing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicola Crossland
4School of Community Health and Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK. refle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gill Moncrieff
2School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stephanie Heys
5North West Ambulance Service, Bolton, UK
Roles: Consultant Midwife
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arni Sarian
6School of Medicine, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanne Cull
2School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soo Downe
2School of Community Health & Midwifery, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Objectives To explore the impact of COVID-19 on companionship for women using maternity services in England, as part of the Achieving Safe and Personalised maternity care In Response to Epidemics (ASPIRE COVID-19 UK) study.

Setting Maternity care provision in England.

Participants Interviews were held with 26 national governmental, professional, and service-user organisation leads including representatives from the Royal College of Midwives, NHS England, Birthrights and AIMS (July-Dec). Other data included public-facing outputs logged from 25 maternity Trusts (Sept/Oct) and data extracted from 78 documents from 8 key governmental, professional and service-user organisations that informed national maternity care guidance and policy (Feb-Dec).

Results Six themes emerged: ‘Postcode lottery of care’ highlights variations in companionship practices, ‘Confusion and stress around ‘rules’’ relates to a lack of and variable information concerning companionship, ‘Unintended consequences’ concerns the negative impacts of restricted companionship on service-users and staff, ‘Need for flexibility’ highlights concerns about applying companionship policies irrespective of need, ‘‘Acceptable’ time for support’ highlights variations in when and if companionship was ‘allowed’ antenatally and intrapartum; and ‘Loss of human rights for gain in infection control’ emphasizes how a predominant focus on infection control was at a cost to psychological safety and women’s human rights.

Conclusions Policies concerning companionship have been inconsistently applied within English maternity services during the COVID-19 pandemic. In some cases, policies were not justified by the level of risk, and were applied indiscriminately regardless of need. This was associated with psychological harms for some women and staff. There is an urgent need to determine how to balance risks and benefits sensitively and flexibly and to optimise outcomes during the current and future crisis situations.

Strengths and limitations of this study

  • This is the first paper to consider links between policy and practice in companionship in maternity care during the COVID-19 pandemic;

  • Data triangulation across stakeholders, policy and practice provides nuanced and context related perspectives on why and how companionship was impacted;

  • Stakeholders included representatives from all key agencies involved in maternity care;

  • Practice related issues were collected from the maternity Trust website and social media-based public facing information, which may or may not reflect actual care practices;

  • The study does not include information directly reported by parents and healthcare professionals.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), as part of UK Research and Innovations rapid response to COVID-19 [grant number ES/V004581/1]. Full details of the main study are available via ResearchRegistry (researchregistry5911) and via UKRI Gateway (https://gtr.ukri.org/projects?ref=ES%2FV004581%2F1)

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethics approval for the study was given from the Health ethics sub-committee from the University of Central Lancashire (project no: 0079 - 24th June 2020).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Trust level data is included in the paper. Details of all documents analysed is provided/with all information freely available. All relevant interview data concerning companionship will be openly available from UCLanData and a doi provided on paper acceptance.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 09, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives
Gill Thomson, Marie-Clare Balaam, Rebecca Nowland, Nicola Crossland, Gill Moncrieff, Stephanie Heys, Arni Sarian, Joanne Cull, Soo Downe, ASPIRE-COVID19 Collaborative Group
medRxiv 2021.04.08.21254762; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21254762
Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Companionship for women using English maternity services during COVID-19: National and organisational perspectives
Gill Thomson, Marie-Clare Balaam, Rebecca Nowland, Nicola Crossland, Gill Moncrieff, Stephanie Heys, Arni Sarian, Joanne Cull, Soo Downe, ASPIRE-COVID19 Collaborative Group
medRxiv 2021.04.08.21254762; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.08.21254762

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (430)
  • Allergy and Immunology (756)
  • Anesthesia (221)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (3294)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (364)
  • Dermatology (279)
  • Emergency Medicine (479)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (1171)
  • Epidemiology (13375)
  • Forensic Medicine (19)
  • Gastroenterology (899)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (5153)
  • Geriatric Medicine (482)
  • Health Economics (783)
  • Health Informatics (3268)
  • Health Policy (1140)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (1190)
  • Hematology (431)
  • HIV/AIDS (1017)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (14627)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (913)
  • Medical Education (477)
  • Medical Ethics (127)
  • Nephrology (523)
  • Neurology (4925)
  • Nursing (262)
  • Nutrition (730)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (883)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (795)
  • Oncology (2524)
  • Ophthalmology (724)
  • Orthopedics (281)
  • Otolaryngology (347)
  • Pain Medicine (323)
  • Palliative Medicine (90)
  • Pathology (543)
  • Pediatrics (1302)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (550)
  • Primary Care Research (557)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (4212)
  • Public and Global Health (7504)
  • Radiology and Imaging (1705)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (1013)
  • Respiratory Medicine (980)
  • Rheumatology (480)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (497)
  • Sports Medicine (424)
  • Surgery (548)
  • Toxicology (72)
  • Transplantation (236)
  • Urology (205)