Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Brain-age predicts subsequent dementia in memory clinic patients

View ORCID ProfileFrancesca Biondo, Amelia Jewell, Megan Pritchard, Dag Aarsland, Claire J. Steves, Christoph Mueller, View ORCID ProfileJames H. Cole
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.03.21254781
Francesca Biondo
1Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
3Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Francesca Biondo
  • For correspondence: f.biondo@ucl.ac.uk
Amelia Jewell
2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Megan Pritchard
2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dag Aarsland
4Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
5Centre for Age-Related Research, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire J. Steves
6Department of Ageing and Health, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, UK
7Department of Twin Research and Genetic Epidemiology, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christoph Mueller
2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
4Department of Old Age Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
James H. Cole
1Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, UK
2South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
3Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, UK
8Dementia Research Centre, Institute of Neurology, University College London, UK
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for James H. Cole
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Research into quantitative neuroimaging biomarkers of dementia risk rarely uses data representative of everyday clinic practice.

METHODS We analysed T1-weighted MRI scans from memory clinic patients (n=1140; 60.2% female and mean [SD] age of 70.0 [10.8] years) to derive ‘brain-age’, an index of age-related brain health. We determined which patients went on to develop dementia (n=476) via linkage to electronic health records.

RESULTS Cox regression indicated a 3% increased risk of dementia per brain-PAD year (brain-PAD = brain-age minus chronological age), HR(95% CI)=1.03(1.02, 1.04), p<0.001, adjusted for age, age2, sex, MMSE and normalised brain volume. Brain-PAD remained significant even with a minimum time-to-diagnosis of 3 years (HR=1.06) and with MMSE score ≥ 27 (HR=1.03).

DISCUSSION Memory clinic patients with older-appearing brains are more likely to receive a subsequent dementia diagnosis. These results from a ‘real-world’ dataset suggest quantitative neuroimaging biomarkers like brain-age could be readily used in the clinic.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW Multiple previous studies were identified that have modelled dementia risk using quantitative neuroimaging, however, screening of participants based on comorbidities and contraindications alongside sociodemographic and healthcare sampling biases, limits the generalisation of these studies to real-world clinical settings. To facilitate better translation from research to the clinic, datasets that are more representative of dementia patient groups are warranted.

INTERPRETATION Brain-age is an index of ‘biological’ age based on a quantitative analysis of T1-weighted MRI scans. Memory clinic patients with biologically older-appearing brains are more likely to receive a subsequent dementia diagnosis, independent of medical history, age, sex, MMSE score and normalised brain volumes. These findings suggest that brain-age has potential to be used early-on in memory clinics as a biomarker to aid detection of patients at high-risk of developing dementia.

FUTURE DIRECTIONS Does the addition of T2-weighted MRI scan information and/or localised brain-age values improve dementia prediction?

Competing Interest Statement

Authors report no conflicts of interest. Potential conflict of interest: JHC is a scientific advisor to and shareholder in Brain Key, a medical image analysis company.

Funding Statement

The study was funded by a Wellcome Trust Seed Award in Science (213996/Z/18/Z). CM receives salary support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London. CJS receives salary support from Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the Chronic Disease Research Foundation. This paper represents independent research partly funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Oxford REC C reference 18/SC/0372 & NIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre: CRIS reference 19-008

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Patient data not available.

  • Acronyms

    (ACE)
    Addenbrookes’ Cognitive Examination
    (AD)
    Alzheimer’s disease
    (brain-PAD)
    Brain Predicted Age Difference
    (BRC)
    Maudsley NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
    (CRIS)
    Clinical Record Interactive Search
    (EHRs)
    Electronic Health Records
    (HES)
    Hospital Episode Statistics
    (MCI)
    Mild Cognitive Impairment
    (MMSE)
    Mini-Mental State Examination
    (MRI)
    Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    (NLP)
    Natural Language Processing
    (ONS)
    Office of National Statistics
    (PET)
    Positron Emission Tomography
    (QC)
    Quality Control
    (SLaM NHS)
    South London and the Maudsley National Health Service Foundation Trust
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted April 07, 2021.
    Download PDF

    Supplementary Material

    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Brain-age predicts subsequent dementia in memory clinic patients
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Brain-age predicts subsequent dementia in memory clinic patients
    Francesca Biondo, Amelia Jewell, Megan Pritchard, Dag Aarsland, Claire J. Steves, Christoph Mueller, James H. Cole
    medRxiv 2021.04.03.21254781; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.03.21254781
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Brain-age predicts subsequent dementia in memory clinic patients
    Francesca Biondo, Amelia Jewell, Megan Pritchard, Dag Aarsland, Claire J. Steves, Christoph Mueller, James H. Cole
    medRxiv 2021.04.03.21254781; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.03.21254781

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Health Informatics
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (76)
    • Allergy and Immunology (196)
    • Anesthesia (54)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (489)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (90)
    • Dermatology (56)
    • Emergency Medicine (168)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
    • Epidemiology (5689)
    • Forensic Medicine (3)
    • Gastroenterology (216)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (868)
    • Geriatric Medicine (88)
    • Health Economics (232)
    • Health Informatics (762)
    • Health Policy (392)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (254)
    • Hematology (105)
    • HIV/AIDS (182)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6488)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (391)
    • Medical Education (117)
    • Medical Ethics (28)
    • Nephrology (93)
    • Neurology (850)
    • Nursing (44)
    • Nutrition (141)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (163)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (262)
    • Oncology (514)
    • Ophthalmology (163)
    • Orthopedics (44)
    • Otolaryngology (107)
    • Pain Medicine (48)
    • Palliative Medicine (21)
    • Pathology (149)
    • Pediatrics (250)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
    • Primary Care Research (114)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (969)
    • Public and Global Health (2231)
    • Radiology and Imaging (377)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
    • Respiratory Medicine (312)
    • Rheumatology (109)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (81)
    • Sports Medicine (82)
    • Surgery (118)
    • Toxicology (25)
    • Transplantation (34)
    • Urology (42)