Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Cost-effectiveness of Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a microsimulation study

View ORCID ProfileShuang Hao, View ORCID ProfileEmelie Heintz, View ORCID ProfileEllinor Östensson, Andrea Discacciati, Fredrik Jäderling, Henrik Grönberg, View ORCID ProfileMartin Eklund, Tobias Nordström, View ORCID ProfileMark Clements
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.31.21254617
Shuang Hao
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Shuang Hao
Emelie Heintz
2Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Emelie Heintz
Ellinor Östensson
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ellinor Östensson
Andrea Discacciati
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fredrik Jäderling
3Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna (L1:00), SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
4Department of Radiology, Capio St Göran Hospital, Sankt Göransplan 1, 112 19 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henrik Grönberg
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Eklund
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Martin Eklund
Tobias Nordström
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
5Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Mörbygårdsvägen, 182 88 Danderyd, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Clements
1Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Nobels väg 12A, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Mark Clements
  • For correspondence: mark.clements@ki.se
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Supplementary material
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Objective Assess the cost-effectiveness of no screening and quadrennial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based screening for prostate cancer using either Stockholm3 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test as a reflex test.

Methods Test characteristics were estimated from the STHLM3-MR study (NCT03377881). A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a lifetime societal perspective using a microsimulation model for men aged 55-69 in Sweden for no screening and three quadrennial screening strategies, including: PSA≥3ng/mL; and Stockholm3 with reflex test thresholds of PSA≥1.5 and 2ng/mL. Men with a positive test had an MRI, and those MRI positive had combined targeted and systematic biopsies. Predictions included the number of tests, cancer incidence and mortality, costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainties in key parameters were assessed using sensitivity analyses.

Results Compared with no screening, the screening strategies were predicted to reduce prostate cancer deaths by 7-9% across a lifetime and were considered to be moderate costs per QALY gained in Sweden. Using Stockholm3 with a reflex threshold of PSA≥2ng/mL resulted in a 60% reduction in MRI compared with screening using PSA. This Stockholm3 strategy was cost-effective with a probability of 70% at a cost-effectiveness threshold of €47,218 (500,000 SEK).

Conclusions All screening strategies were considered to be moderate costs per QALY gained compared with no screening. Screening with Stockholm3 test at a reflex threshold of PSA≥2ng/mL and MRI was predicted to be cost-effective in Sweden. Use of the Stockholm3 test may reduce screening-related harms and costs while maintaining the health benefits from early detection.

Competing Interest Statement

Henrik Gronberg has five prostate cancer diagnostic related patents pending. Martin Eklund is named on four of these five patent applications. Karolinska Institutet collaborates with A3P Biomedical in developing the technology for the Stockholm3 test. Henrik Gronberg, Martin Eklund and Tobias Nordstrom own shares in A3P Biomedical. All other authors declare no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NCT03377881

Clinical Protocols

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03377881

Funding Statement

Funding for this study is provided by the Swedish Research Council (through the Swedish eScience Research Centre, the Cancer Risk Prediction Center and project 2018-02526), Prostatacancerforbundet, Karolinska Institutet (KID) and Cancerfonden (project CAN 2018/539).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

The use of the data from the Stockholm PSA and Biopsy Register was approved by the Ethical Review Board, Stockholm (dnr 2012/438-31/3, dnr 2016/620-32). The STHLM3-MR Study was approved by the Ethical Review Board, Stockholm (dnr 2017/1280-31) and the registration number was NCT03377881. All study participants have given written informed consent to publish these case details. All data were analysed anonymously.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

  • Funding Funding for this study is provided by the Swedish Research Council (through the Swedish eScience Research Centre, the Cancer Risk Prediction Center and project 2018-02526), Prostatacancerförbundet, Karolinska Institutet (KID) and Cancerfonden (project CAN 2018/539).

  • Role of Funder/Sponsor The funder had no role in: the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Data Availability

The raw data used for simulation from the Stockholm PSA and Biopsy Register (SPBR) are potentially identifiable and data access to those data has been restricted by the Stockholm Ethical Review Board. The authors do not own these data and had no special privileges in accessing the data. Anyone wishing to access the individual level data would need to apply for permission through an Ethical Review Board and from the primary data owners, including the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare and Karolinska Institutet.

https://github.com/mclements/prostata

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted April 06, 2021.
Download PDF

Supplementary Material

Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cost-effectiveness of Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a microsimulation study
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Cost-effectiveness of Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a microsimulation study
Shuang Hao, Emelie Heintz, Ellinor Östensson, Andrea Discacciati, Fredrik Jäderling, Henrik Grönberg, Martin Eklund, Tobias Nordström, Mark Clements
medRxiv 2021.03.31.21254617; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.31.21254617
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Cost-effectiveness of Stockholm3 test and magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer screening: a microsimulation study
Shuang Hao, Emelie Heintz, Ellinor Östensson, Andrea Discacciati, Fredrik Jäderling, Henrik Grönberg, Martin Eklund, Tobias Nordström, Mark Clements
medRxiv 2021.03.31.21254617; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.31.21254617

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Health Economics
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (194)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (488)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (89)
  • Dermatology (56)
  • Emergency Medicine (168)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
  • Epidemiology (5661)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (215)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (856)
  • Geriatric Medicine (88)
  • Health Economics (229)
  • Health Informatics (759)
  • Health Policy (388)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (250)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (181)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6455)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (388)
  • Medical Education (116)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (90)
  • Neurology (845)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (141)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (161)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (258)
  • Oncology (514)
  • Ophthalmology (162)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (105)
  • Pain Medicine (47)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (248)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
  • Primary Care Research (113)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (959)
  • Public and Global Health (2222)
  • Radiology and Imaging (375)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
  • Respiratory Medicine (311)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (80)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)