Abstract
Objective To explore parent’s experiences and views relating to their use of children’s emergency healthcare services during the Covid-19 pandemic.
Design Qualitative telephone interview study using in-depth interviews, based on the principles of grounded theory. Recorded, transcribed verbatim, managed in NVivo version 12, analysed by thematic analysis.
Setting North East England, United Kingdom.
Participants Parents of children aged 0-8 years.
Findings Three major themes emerged from the interview data: Risk to children and families, Sources of Information, and Making Healthcare-seeking Decisions. These themes encompassed a range of intellectual and emotional responses in the way that parents interpreted information related to Covid-19, and their sense of responsibility towards family and wider society.
Conclusions Together these themes aid understanding of the changes in paediatric emergency department attendances reported in the early months of the Covid-19 pandemic in the UK. The analysis suggests that public health messaging directed at those seeking urgent care for children may be inadequate and lead to adverse consequences, the impacts of which require further study and refinement.
What is known about the subject
Following lockdown, there was a substantial reduction in the number of children taken to unscheduled medical care across the country
Delays in presentation can impact on children’s health
It is not known what parents’ views are on accessing emergency health services in a pandemic situation
What this study adds
Parents had to weigh up a number of information sources before deciding on whether to take their child to hospital
Public health messaging directed at those seeking urgent care for children may lead to a reduction in use of emergency healthcare services
Future lockdowns should implement focussed strategies, optimising use of emergency healthcare services, whilst avoiding harm.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Clinical Trial
N/A (Not a clinical trial)
Funding Statement
No external funding was received for this work. This project/research/work is supported by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) for the North East and North Cumbria (NENC). SB, MB and JR are members of the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration for the North East and North Cumbria.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was granted by Newcastle Universitys Faculty of Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee (Ref: 1919/2812).
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Additional data are not available.
