Abstract
Background It is important to establish criteria to define Vascular Cognitive Impairment (VCI) in India as VCI is an image-based diagnosis and MRI changes resulting from age with prevalent vascular risk factors may confound MRI interpretation.
Objective To establish normative community data for MRI volumetry including white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV), correlated with age-stratified cognitive scores and vascular risk factors in adults ≥40 years old.
Materials and Methods We screened 2651 individuals without known neurological morbidity, living in Mumbai and nearby rural areas, using validated Marathi translations of Kolkata Cognitive Battery (KCB) and Geriatric depression score (GDS). We stratified 1961 persons with GDS ≤9 by age and cognitive score, and randomly selected ten percent from each subgroup for MRI brain volumetry. Crude volumes were standardized to reflect percentage of intracranial volume.
Results MRI volumetry studies were done in 199 individuals (F/M = 90/109; 73 with BMI ≥25; 44 hypertensives; 29 diabetics; mean cognitive score 76.5). Both grey and white matter volumes decreased with increasing age. WMHV increased with age and hypertension. Grey matter volume decreased with increasing WMHV. Positive predictors of cognition included standardized hippocampal volume (HCV), urban living, education, and BMI, while WMHV and age were negative predictors. Urban dwellers had higher cognitive scores than rural, and (paradoxically) smaller HCV.
Conclusions Further study is warranted into sociodemographic and biological factors that mutually influence cognition. Our findings contribute to baseline diagnostic criteria for VCI and could help in early diagnosis and control of cognitive decline and its key risk factors.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study was fully funded by the Cognitive Science Research Initiative of the Department of Science & Technology, Government of India.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
The study design was approved by the Cognitive Science Research Initiative of the Department of Science & Technology under the Government of India, and ethical approval was granted by the institutional ethical committee of Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Study funding: Fully funded by the Cognitive Science Research Initiative, Department of Science & Technology, Government of India (Grant ID: CSRI 129/2012).
Ethical approval: Approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai (approval no. 15/2015).
Declarations of interest: None.
Data Availability
Anonymized data will be shared by reasonable request from any qualified investigator.