Abstract
Objectives Previous work has suggested wide variation in policies for cataract surgery across different Commissioning Groups, but did not evaluate the potential impact of that variation on access.
This study characterises the variation in rates of cataract surgery across England, reviews threshold policies against NICE guidance, and explores whether stringency of policy has a significant effect on access, to determine whether threshold policies are contributing to unequal access to surgery. It examines the effect of social deprivation and the impact of prior approval processes, where these are in place.
Methods Information on number of surgeries undertaken and threshold policy were provided from 127 Clinical Commissioning Groups (“CCGs”) through Freedom of Information request. The results were grouped by threshold stringency and analysed on an age group-corrected basis. ANOVA testing was performed to assess effect of policy stringency on regional rates of cataract surgery.
Results In the population over 60 years old, rates of cataract surgery vary across CCGs, from 1,980 to 6,427 per 100,000 population with a standard deviation (784.76) of 22% of the mean value, 3,598.
There is variability in threshold policies for cataract surgery between CCGs: 33 had no policy, 45 utilised NICE-compliant policies, accessible on the basis of Quality of Life (“QoL”) impact, and 39 required that Visual Acuity (“VA”) threshold be exceeded, against current NICE guidance. Increasing restrictiveness of policy is associated with decreasing rates of cataract surgery (p<0.01) and accounts for 18% of the total variation seen. Variation in deprivation across CCGs contributes to 11% of the total deviation (p<0.01).
There is little evidential basis to many policies, with 40% of policies not citing any supporting evidence. Prior approval processes represent 7.3% of total cataract activity but are not significantly associated with a reduced rate of cataract surgery (p=0.56).
Conclusion Over two-thirds of CCGs continue to use threshold-based policies for access to cataract surgery, with increasing stringency of policy associated with decreasing cataract activity. A third of CCGs control access solely on the basis of visual acuity requirements, despite NICE guidance to the contrary. There is a need for consistency in policy across CCGs, and introduction of validated quality of life impact assessment tool to reduce variability of access.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This study received no funding and had no sponsors.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
n/a
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes
Copyright The Corresponding Author has the right to grant on behalf of all authors and does grant on behalf of all authors, an exclusive licence on a worldwide basis to the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd to permit this article (if accepted) to be published in BMJ editions and any other BMJPGL products and sublicences such use and exploit all subsidiary rights, as set out in our licence.
Data Availability
No additional data available