ABSTRACT
Background Alveolar macrophage dysfunction may contribute to Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) pathogenesis, however this has been little studied. Objective: To investigate the pathophysiological link between alveolar macrophage efferocytosis, alveolar neutrophil apoptosis and clinical outcomes in ARDS patients, and to determine whether efferocytosis can be restored.
Methods Ventilated sepsis patients with or without ARDS underwent broncho-alveolar lavage. Apoptosis of alveolar neutrophils was assessed using flow cytometry. Alveolar macrophages were isolated and used in flow cytometric efferocytosis assays with labelled apoptotic neutrophils. Alveolar macrophages were also isolated from the lung tissue of lobectomy patients, then treated with pooled ARDS BAL fluid prior to functional assessment. Rac1 gene expression was assessed using RT-qPCR.
Results Patients with sepsis-related ARDS have decreased alveolar macrophage efferocytosis and increased alveolar neutrophil apoptosis compared to control ventilated sepsis patients. Across all ventilated sepsis patients, alveolar macrophage efferocytosis correlated negatively with alveolar cytokines (IL-8, IL-1ra), duration of ventilation and mortality. ARDS BAL treatment of alveolar macrophages decreased efferocytosis and Rac1 gene expression, however bacterial phagocytosis was preserved. Unexpectedly, alveolar macrophage efferocytosis receptor expression (MerTK, CD206) decreased and expression of the anti-efferocytosis receptor SIRPα increased following ARDS BAL treatment. Rho-associated kinase inhibition partially restored alveolar macrophage efferocytosis in an in vitro model of ARDS.
Conclusions Patients with sepsis-related ARDS have impaired AM efferocytosis, which potentially contributes to ARDS pathogenesis and negatively impacts clinical outcomes, including mortality. Strategies to upregulate AM efferocytosis may be of value for attenuating inflammation in ARDS.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
This work was funded by Medical Research Council grants MR/N021185/1 (RYM) and MR/L002736/1 (AS).
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Ethical approval was obtained to recruit ventilated sepsis patients with and without ARDS (UK Research Ethics Committee 16/WA/0169), and for the use of lung tissue samples from patients undergoing routine thoracic surgery (UK Research Ethics Committee 17/WM/0272). For patients who lacked capacity, permission to enrol was sought from a personal legal representative in accordance with the UK Mental Capacity Act (2005). For patients with capacity, written informed consent was obtained from the patient.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
Anonymised data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
