Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Standard care vs. awake prone position in adult non-intubated patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 infection – A multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial

View ORCID ProfileDevachandran Jayakumar, Pratheema Ramachandran, Ebenezer Rabindrarajan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Nagarajan Ramakrishnan, Ramesh Venkataraman
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.13.21253499
Devachandran Jayakumar
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Speciality Hospital – OMR, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Devachandran Jayakumar
  • For correspondence: deva@icuconsultants.com
Pratheema Ramachandran
1Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Speciality Hospital – OMR, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ebenezer Rabindrarajan
2Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Speciality Hospital – Vanagaram, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan
3Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Main Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nagarajan Ramakrishnan
3Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Main Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ramesh Venkataraman
3Department of Critical Care Medicine, Apollo Main Hospital, Chennai, India
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background The primary manifestation of Corona Virus Disease −2019 (COVID-19) is acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to pneumonia and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Prone position has been shown to improve outcomes in ventilated patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. The feasibility and safety of awake prone positioning and its impact on outcomes if any, in non-intubated patients with mild to moderate acute respiratory distress syndrome secondary to COVID-19 is unknown. Results of the observational studies published thus far in this pandemic have been conflicting. In this context, we conducted a multi-centre, parallel group, randomised controlled feasibility study on awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19 pneumonia requiring supplemental oxygen.

Methods 60 patients diagnosed with acute hypoxic respiratory failure secondary to COVID −19 pneumonia requiring 4 or more litres of oxygen to maintain a saturation of ≥ 92% were recruited in this study. Thirty patients each were randomised to either standard care or awake prone group. Patients randomised to the standard care were allowed to change their position as per comfort and patients randomized to the prone group were encouraged to self-prone for at least 6 hours a day. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients adhering to the protocol in each group. Secondary outcomes include failure of therapy leading to escalation of respiratory support, number of hours prone, maximum hours of continuous prone positioning in a day, length of stay in ICU, ICU mortality, total number of patients needing intubation and adverse events.

Results In the prone group, 43% (13 out of 30) of patients were able to self-prone for 6 or more hours a day. The median maximum prone duration per session was 2 hours. In the supine group, 47% (14 out of 30) were completely supine and 53% spent some hours in the prone position, but none exceeded 6 hours. There was no significant difference in any of the secondary outcomes between the two groups and there were no adverse events.

Interpretation Awake proning in non-intubated patients with acute hypoxic respiratory failure is feasible and safe under clinical trial conditions. The results of our feasibility study will potentially help in the design of larger definitive trials to address this key knowledge gap.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

CTRI/2020/12/029702

Funding Statement

It is an unfunded trial approved by the institutional ethics committee

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

This study was approved by institutional ethics committee for biomedical research, Apollo Hospitals, Chennai (Approval No: AVH-C-S-005/05-20).

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Deidentified data will be made available to authors upon request. Interested authors can contact the corresponding author by email for the data.

Copyright 
The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
Back to top
PreviousNext
Posted March 13, 2021.
Download PDF
Data/Code
Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Standard care vs. awake prone position in adult non-intubated patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 infection – A multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Share
Standard care vs. awake prone position in adult non-intubated patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 infection – A multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial
Devachandran Jayakumar, Pratheema Ramachandran, Ebenezer Rabindrarajan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Nagarajan Ramakrishnan, Ramesh Venkataraman
medRxiv 2021.03.13.21253499; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.13.21253499
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Standard care vs. awake prone position in adult non-intubated patients with acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 infection – A multi-centre feasibility randomized controlled trial
Devachandran Jayakumar, Pratheema Ramachandran, Ebenezer Rabindrarajan, Bharath Kumar Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Nagarajan Ramakrishnan, Ramesh Venkataraman
medRxiv 2021.03.13.21253499; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.13.21253499

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Subject Area

  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine
Subject Areas
All Articles
  • Addiction Medicine (76)
  • Allergy and Immunology (195)
  • Anesthesia (54)
  • Cardiovascular Medicine (489)
  • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (89)
  • Dermatology (56)
  • Emergency Medicine (168)
  • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (211)
  • Epidemiology (5674)
  • Forensic Medicine (3)
  • Gastroenterology (215)
  • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (863)
  • Geriatric Medicine (88)
  • Health Economics (230)
  • Health Informatics (761)
  • Health Policy (390)
  • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (250)
  • Hematology (105)
  • HIV/AIDS (182)
  • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (6467)
  • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (390)
  • Medical Education (117)
  • Medical Ethics (28)
  • Nephrology (90)
  • Neurology (846)
  • Nursing (44)
  • Nutrition (141)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology (162)
  • Occupational and Environmental Health (258)
  • Oncology (514)
  • Ophthalmology (163)
  • Orthopedics (44)
  • Otolaryngology (105)
  • Pain Medicine (48)
  • Palliative Medicine (21)
  • Pathology (149)
  • Pediatrics (250)
  • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (146)
  • Primary Care Research (113)
  • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (963)
  • Public and Global Health (2224)
  • Radiology and Imaging (376)
  • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (174)
  • Respiratory Medicine (312)
  • Rheumatology (109)
  • Sexual and Reproductive Health (80)
  • Sports Medicine (82)
  • Surgery (118)
  • Toxicology (25)
  • Transplantation (34)
  • Urology (42)