Abstract
Background Intraoperative 3D imaging is a valuable tool to visualise complex anatomical structures and position implants optimally. This is an emerging technology and there is a paucity in literature of articles describing the same.
Objectives This systematic review aims to compare the outcome of surgeries done under 3D imaging to those done under 2D fluoroscopy by analysing the evidence in literature.
Methods A systematic review will be conducted adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and Scopus will be searched with a pre-defined search string. A manual search will also be conducted on the references of the included articles. Original research articles published in English that directly compare the outcomes of intraoperative 3D imaging with fluoroscopy will be included. Review articles, conference abstracts and animal studies will be excluded. Outcome measures will be extracted from the selected studies and analysed with the help of appropriate software.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
No external funding was recieved.
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Since this is a systematic review, ethics approval is not required.
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
All data referred to in the manuscript will be available as supplementary files along with the final article.
