Skip to main content
medRxiv
  • Home
  • About
  • Submit
  • ALERTS / RSS
Advanced Search

Diagnostic performance of standard and inverted grey-scale CXR in detection of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients. A single institution study in the region of Abu Dhabi

View ORCID ProfileAbeer Ahmed AlHelali, Mohamed Ashfaque Kukkady, View ORCID ProfileGhufran Aref Saeed, Tamer Ibrahim Elholiby, Rabab Abdulrahman Al Mansoori, Luai A Ahmed
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250914
Abeer Ahmed AlHelali
1Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Abeer Ahmed AlHelali
  • For correspondence: aalhelali@seha.ae
Mohamed Ashfaque Kukkady
1Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ghufran Aref Saeed
1Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ghufran Aref Saeed
Tamer Ibrahim Elholiby
1Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rabab Abdulrahman Al Mansoori
1Department of Radiology, Sheikh Khalifa Medical City, Abu Dhabi, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luai A Ahmed
2Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Abstract
  • Full Text
  • Info/History
  • Metrics
  • Data/Code
  • Preview PDF
Loading

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate diagnostic performance of greyscale and inverted greyscale Chest X-ray (CXR) using Computed Tomography (CT) scan as a gold standard.

Methods In this retrospective study, electronic medical records of 120 patients who had valid CXR and High-resolution CT (HRCT) within less than 24 hours after having a positive COVID-19 RT-PCR test during the period from May 19 th to May 23 rd 2020 in a single tertiary care center were reviewed.

PA chest radiographs were presented on 2 occasions to 5 radiologists to evaluate the role and appropriateness of greyscale and inverted greyscale chest radiographs (CXR). The images were viewed on high-specification viewing systems using a primary display monitors and compared it to computed tomography (CT) findings for screening and management of suspected or confirmed COVID-19 patients.

Results Ninety-six (80%) patients had positive CT findings, 81 (67.5%) had positive grey scale CXR lesions, and 25 (20.8%) had better detection in the inverted grey scale CXR. The CXR sensitivity for COVID-19 pneumonia was 93.8% (95% CI (86.2% - 98.0%) and the specificity was 48.7% (95% CI (32.4% - 65.2%). The CXR sensitivity of detection of lung lesions was slightly higher in male (95.1% (95% CI (86.3% - 99.0%)) than female (90.0% (95% CI (68.3% - 98.8%)), while the specificity was 48.0% (95% CI (27.8% - 68.7%) and 50.0% (95% CI (23.0% - 77.0%) in males and females, respectively. However, no significant difference was detected in ROC area between men and women.

Conclusions The sensitivity of detection of lung lesions of CXR was relatively high, particularly in men. The results of the study support the idea of considering conventional radiographs as an important diagnostic tool in suspected COVID-19 patients especially in healthcare facilities where there is no access to HRCT scans.

Highlights

  • CXR shows high sensitivity for detecting lung lesions in HRCT confirmed COVID-19 patients.

  • Better detection of lesions was noted in the inverted grey scale CXR in (20.8%) of cases with positive findings in standard greyscale CXR.

  • Conventional radiographs can be used as diagnostic tools in suspected COVID-19 patients especially in healthcare facilities where there is no access to HRCT scans.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Clinical Trial

NA

Funding Statement

the research received no specific grant from any funding agency

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

(Abu Dhabi COVID19 Research Ethics Committee) Ref: DOH/CVDC/2020/1126.

All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

Available data

  • Abbreviations

    CXR
    Chest X-ray
    CT
    Computed Tomography
    COVID-19
    Corona virus disease 2019
    HRCT
    High-resolution CT
    SARS-CoV-2
    Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona-Virus 2
    WHO
    World Health Organization
    RT-PCR
    Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction
    MERS
    Middle East Respiratory Syndrome
    H1N1
    subtype of influenza A virus
  • Copyright 
    The copyright holder for this preprint is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission.
    Back to top
    PreviousNext
    Posted February 03, 2021.
    Download PDF
    Data/Code
    Email

    Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about medRxiv.

    NOTE: Your email address is requested solely to identify you as the sender of this article.

    Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
    Diagnostic performance of standard and inverted grey-scale CXR in detection of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients. A single institution study in the region of Abu Dhabi
    (Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from medRxiv
    (Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the medRxiv website.
    CAPTCHA
    This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
    Share
    Diagnostic performance of standard and inverted grey-scale CXR in detection of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients. A single institution study in the region of Abu Dhabi
    Abeer Ahmed AlHelali, Mohamed Ashfaque Kukkady, Ghufran Aref Saeed, Tamer Ibrahim Elholiby, Rabab Abdulrahman Al Mansoori, Luai A Ahmed
    medRxiv 2021.02.01.21250914; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250914
    Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
    Citation Tools
    Diagnostic performance of standard and inverted grey-scale CXR in detection of lung lesions in COVID-19 patients. A single institution study in the region of Abu Dhabi
    Abeer Ahmed AlHelali, Mohamed Ashfaque Kukkady, Ghufran Aref Saeed, Tamer Ibrahim Elholiby, Rabab Abdulrahman Al Mansoori, Luai A Ahmed
    medRxiv 2021.02.01.21250914; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.01.21250914

    Citation Manager Formats

    • BibTeX
    • Bookends
    • EasyBib
    • EndNote (tagged)
    • EndNote 8 (xml)
    • Medlars
    • Mendeley
    • Papers
    • RefWorks Tagged
    • Ref Manager
    • RIS
    • Zotero
    • Tweet Widget
    • Facebook Like
    • Google Plus One

    Subject Area

    • Radiology and Imaging
    Subject Areas
    All Articles
    • Addiction Medicine (70)
    • Allergy and Immunology (168)
    • Anesthesia (49)
    • Cardiovascular Medicine (448)
    • Dentistry and Oral Medicine (80)
    • Dermatology (55)
    • Emergency Medicine (157)
    • Endocrinology (including Diabetes Mellitus and Metabolic Disease) (190)
    • Epidemiology (5216)
    • Forensic Medicine (3)
    • Gastroenterology (194)
    • Genetic and Genomic Medicine (750)
    • Geriatric Medicine (77)
    • Health Economics (212)
    • Health Informatics (694)
    • Health Policy (352)
    • Health Systems and Quality Improvement (223)
    • Hematology (98)
    • HIV/AIDS (162)
    • Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (5816)
    • Intensive Care and Critical Care Medicine (356)
    • Medical Education (102)
    • Medical Ethics (25)
    • Nephrology (80)
    • Neurology (758)
    • Nursing (43)
    • Nutrition (129)
    • Obstetrics and Gynecology (141)
    • Occupational and Environmental Health (231)
    • Oncology (475)
    • Ophthalmology (149)
    • Orthopedics (38)
    • Otolaryngology (93)
    • Pain Medicine (39)
    • Palliative Medicine (19)
    • Pathology (139)
    • Pediatrics (223)
    • Pharmacology and Therapeutics (136)
    • Primary Care Research (96)
    • Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology (854)
    • Public and Global Health (1993)
    • Radiology and Imaging (344)
    • Rehabilitation Medicine and Physical Therapy (157)
    • Respiratory Medicine (283)
    • Rheumatology (93)
    • Sexual and Reproductive Health (72)
    • Sports Medicine (75)
    • Surgery (108)
    • Toxicology (25)
    • Transplantation (29)
    • Urology (39)