Abstract
Background Cancer patients’ treatment is often dispersed across multiple physician communities that may not exchange information. We measured the association between this type of discoordinated care and healthcare utilization, cost, and mortality in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods Stage IV NSCLC patients ≥65 years were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database attached to Medicare claims. A discoordinated care subgroup was selected using a novel index that approximated how many physician communities each patient encountered. Communities were defined by (1) using claims data to create a nationwide social network of healthcare providers and then (2) dividing that network into communities using cluster label propagation. Associations between discoordinated care and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), hospitalizations, the burden of diagnostic imaging, and cost were assessed.
Results Of the 11,417 patients in our cohort, 5,855 received discoordinated care. Discoordination was associated with younger age, higher socioeconomic status, higher physician density, and lack of a home health aide. Discoordinated care was associated with improved OS and CSS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.88 - 0.95 for OS). However, discoordinated patients also received 32% more MRIs (p = 0.007) and paid $494.02 more for imaging (p = 0.004). There was no association with other kinds of imaging, rates of hospitalization, or other healthcare costs, including total cost.
Conclusions Discoordinated care was associated with additional MRIs, but also improved survival. The reason is unclear, but discoordinated patients may be seeking the best care at the expense of continuity.
Question How does dispersing healthcare across multiple physician communities impact healthcare utilization and survival in patients with advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer?
Findings In this retrospective cohort study, we found that discoordinated care was associated with increased utilization of MRIs and total cost of imaging. Surprisingly, it was also associated with improved survival.
Meaning Cancer patients with dispersed healthcare may be seeking care through a tertiary care center or clinical trial. This may lead to increased healthcare utilization but also improved survival.
Competing Interest Statement
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding Statement
N/A
Author Declarations
I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
CUMC Medical center IRB approval
All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.
Yes
Data Availability
SEER-Medicare data is available through the NCI website.
